2025-12-25 10:24:10

CHECK has increased by nearly 200% in two weeks, and the floor price of the corresponding NFT has doubled. Many people are beginning to wonder— is this genuine demand or just another bubble?

From my perspective, this surge is backed by solid data. Regarding user growth, the project launched a public beta version just three months ago, and monthly active users have exceeded 100,000, with players completing over 500,000 battles. This is not just simple narrative hype; real user numbers are speaking.

Looking at the project’s fundamentals, supported by top gaming funds like Animoca, it inherently has considerable industry recognition and resource accumulation. From product data to ecological background, this wave of enthusiasm does not seem to be a castle in the air.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeTears

· 2025-12-28 05:26

100,000 monthly active users, 500,000 battles, this data is indeed quite aggressive Really? Is Animoca backing this worth that much? A 200% increase sounds outrageous, isn't it just a bubble? The user base is there, there's nothing much to argue against NFT floor price doubling... this time it's not just hype, right?

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetectiveBing

· 2025-12-28 04:31

The data is good, but a monthly active user base of 100,000 isn't really a big deal in the entire gaming industry... Let's see the subsequent retention rate. Animoca's endorsement definitely adds points, but I'm just worried it's another capital story told well. This wave of increase is a bit fast, so I'll wait and see first. 50,000 battles sound like a lot, but when converted to per capita, it's not that exaggerated. If you ask me, wait until this hot hype passes to see the real demand. Those jumping in now are all gamblers.

View OriginalReply0

ChainDoctor

· 2025-12-27 13:54

Oh no, the data showing 100,000 monthly active users is quite impressive, but we should also be cautious about this round of growth. Animoca's endorsement is a plus, but I still want to wait and see the subsequent retention rate. Are players really spending real money to play, or are they just here for hype? 500,000 battles sound exciting, but I'm worried it might be a fleeting hot trend. I'm a bit concerned because I haven't seen a clear commercialization path. No matter how good the hype story is, it's all talk. Actually, I just want to ask—does this game really have such strong playability, or is it just attracting people with gold farming? Projects invested in by Animoca have also collapsed before, so we need to be aware of that. It feels like the market is just following the trend; how much genuine demand is there really remains to be seen.

View OriginalReply0

DAOdreamer

· 2025-12-26 11:13

100,000 monthly active users and 500,000 battle data points, this is indeed not the performance of a scam coin. Animoca backing is also no small matter, but the key is whether it can retain users, and not turn into another pump-and-dump scheme. Short-term doubling does not mean long-term value; haven't we learned enough lessons from history? I've heard this narrative too many times; it all depends on subsequent retention rates and innovation, otherwise it's just the traditional pump-and-dump script that manipulates retail investors. The data is indeed solid, but the hype in the secondary market and the genuine demand for the product are often worlds apart.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 2025-12-25 10:49

Well, the data is indeed somewhat impressive; 500,000 battles is no joke. Animoca's backing is quite solid, but this growth rate... still cautious is the way to go. 200% in two weeks? I need to observe a bit more; afraid I might be the next bag holder. 100,000 monthly active users is indeed good, but how long it can be maintained is the key. I was a bit scared when the floor price doubled; why is genuine demand so quickly hyped up? The water in the NFT space is too deep; I prefer to hold stablecoins for safety. Animoca has invested in many projects; not all of them will necessarily succeed. User data looks good, but what about retention rates? That’s the real thing. Is it a bubble or genuine demand? We’ll see after some more time; why rush? The data is there, no doubt, but this pace feels a bit too fast.

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 2025-12-25 10:49

Nah, not convinced. Even Animoca's endorsement can't save the subsequent selling pressure. Let's wait and see. --- 500,000 battles sound like a lot, but what about the conversion rate? Dare to share the actual retention data? --- Again with the fund support and user base. Why does this set of rhetoric feel like I've heard it several times before? --- Doubling the floor price is even more outrageous; it smells too much like pure hype. --- 100,000 monthly active users sounds impressive, but does CHECK really have any core competitiveness, or is it just a game token? --- Animoca's investment is a plus, but that doesn't mean the project's gameplay can hold up on its own. --- Let's see the data support when the next round of sell-off happens. Right now, it's all just narrative.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 2025-12-25 10:47

100,000 monthly active users and 500,000 battle data really do indicate something, but... can Animoca's endorsement guarantee no collapse? --- A 200% increase in just two weeks, this pace is a bit aggressive, gotta be careful of the fate of the bagholders. --- The data looks good, but I still prefer to wait and see about the NFT floor price doubling, it's too easy to reverse. --- True user numbers are there, I admit that, but bubbles and real demand are often just a market sentiment away. --- Animoca's backing does carry some weight, but that doesn't mean CHECK can definitely hold on till the end. --- 500,000 battles sounds like a lot, but on average, each user doesn't participate in many, so the popularity isn't that exaggerated. --- Supported by funds and big data again, sounds just like last year's projects, but what's the ending? --- I won't deny there are real users, but this round of hype is mostly driven by speculation, let's wait until the heat dies down. --- Such a fierce short-term increase, I can only think of one word—trap.

View OriginalReply0

StakeWhisperer

· 2025-12-25 10:43

The data looks good, but can 500,000 battles be exchanged for real money? That's the real deal.

View OriginalReply0

MysteriousZhang

· 2025-12-25 10:34

100,000 monthly active users, 500,000 battle sessions. These numbers are really impressive, not just hype. Animoca's endorsement still carries some weight, but the price has surged too aggressively. Once it breaks 10,000, I start to get nervous, feeling like a dump might happen. Anyway, just get on board first, there's data to back it up. Doubling the floor price is a bit exaggerated. Can it hold this wave?

View OriginalReply0

StableBoi

· 2025-12-25 10:25

Wow, a project endorsed by Animoca with only 100,000 monthly active users after three months? This data is indeed impressive, unlike those pure air coins.

View OriginalReply0