Can META really call itself a META if 65-70% of crypto Twitter isn't actually turning a profit from it? That's the real question. When the majority of participants are underwater, what does that say about the actual utility and value proposition? Seems like the narrative doesn't match the reality on the ground.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Blockblind
· 10h ago
NGL, this is just a game of hot potato. A 70% loss and still have the nerve to boast about utility... LOL
View OriginalReply0
RugPullSurvivor
· 10h ago
Haha, you're so right. Most people are losing money, so what's there to boast about the metaverse?
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 10h ago
There are so many people losing money to this extent that no matter what Meta says, it all seems pale in comparison.
View OriginalReply0
TokenDustCollector
· 10h ago
ngl, this is the common problem in the crypto world—telling a great story, but in the end, looking at the wallet, all the capital is lost...
Can META really call itself a META if 65-70% of crypto Twitter isn't actually turning a profit from it? That's the real question. When the majority of participants are underwater, what does that say about the actual utility and value proposition? Seems like the narrative doesn't match the reality on the ground.