The future of privacy-focused blockchains like Miden is certain—they will inevitably occupy an important position in the ecosystem. However, there is a practical issue: a completely transparent blockchain is like turning all the rooms in a bank building into glass rooms. On the surface, it seems comprehensive, but very few people will actually use it.
Frankly, whether for daily transfers or long-term asset planning, financial privacy is not an option but a fundamental bottom line for freedom and security. Without privacy as a safeguard, user confidence cannot be established. This is also why more and more developers and institutions are beginning to focus on the design of privacy layers—not to evade, but to make true financial freedom possible.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PoolJumper
· 9h ago
The analogy of the glass house is brilliant. Who the hell would want to display their asset details on the street?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 9h ago
The analogy of the glass bank room is brilliant. Transparent blockchains are like putting everyone's wallet balances on a big screen—who the hell would dare to move them?
As for privacy, it's not some gray area; it's a basic human right. A chain without privacy is like public execution—no wonder no one uses it.
Now finally, some people are starting to take this seriously. The folks at Miden have awakened. Financial freedom, to put it simply, must be backed by privacy; otherwise, it's just a new tool for harvesting naive investors without changing the game.
The true ironclad truth: without privacy, no matter how decentralized, it's all pointless.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 9h ago
The analogy of the glass house is brilliant; indeed, no one wants to reveal their entire assets.
Privacy is a fundamental demand—who would open their wallet to strangers?
Things like Miden can only succeed because of this; transparent chains simply can't retain users.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekMaster
· 9h ago
The analogy of the glass house bank is brilliant, so spot on. Privacy is not a luxury, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
BoredApeResistance
· 9h ago
The analogy of the glass house is brilliant, but the problem is that everyone is now under enough scrutiny. Who would dare to run naked in a transparent ledger?
View OriginalReply0
pvt_key_collector
· 10h ago
The analogy of the glass house is brilliant, but to be honest, there are still too many people who confuse privacy with illegality. I'm truly amazed.
View OriginalReply0
GhostInTheChain
· 10h ago
The glass house metaphor is brilliant. Who the hell would want to make transfers in a fully transparent bank?
The future of privacy-focused blockchains like Miden is certain—they will inevitably occupy an important position in the ecosystem. However, there is a practical issue: a completely transparent blockchain is like turning all the rooms in a bank building into glass rooms. On the surface, it seems comprehensive, but very few people will actually use it.
Frankly, whether for daily transfers or long-term asset planning, financial privacy is not an option but a fundamental bottom line for freedom and security. Without privacy as a safeguard, user confidence cannot be established. This is also why more and more developers and institutions are beginning to focus on the design of privacy layers—not to evade, but to make true financial freedom possible.