Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
HodlHer, an AI agent Web3 operating system based on Injective, recently secured $1.5 million in funding. Participants include Chain Capital, Bitrise Capital, and CGV, among others, which gives it some notable backing.
What will this money be mainly used for? It will be invested in HodlOS, the core infrastructure, to continue refining the technology. According to their plans, they are building a multi-agent architecture. Interestingly, they also want to integrate emotional intelligence and decentralized execution—two seemingly unrelated concepts—into a unified system.
In simple terms, they aim for AI agents to operate on-chain not only with rational calculations but also with some perception of user preferences. The Injective chain ecosystem has indeed been competitive over the past two years, with projects spanning from DeFi to AI applications. This approach is a new idea, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on the actual product.
To make AI both do the math and read minds, I have to say this logic feels a bit strange, but Injective's chain is indeed laying the groundwork.
Spending 1.5 million on infrastructure, the key to market-making is to stay stable first. Whether it can succeed depends on whether the arbitrage opportunities during cold start are sufficiently lucrative.
I'm a bit unclear about the multi-agent architecture. How will the liquidity depth of decentralized execution look, and to what extent can capital efficiency be optimized?
The Injective ecosystem has indeed been pushing forward in the past two years, but there's a huge gap between implementing new ideas and actually making money.
Will an AI agent understand my thoughts? First, get your own code running smoothly.
Both fundraising and multi-agent architecture—just want to see what kind of results can be produced in the end.
The Injective ecosystem is definitely laying the groundwork, but I'm worried it might just be another PPT revolution.
Raising funds is easy; real skill is in implementation.
Do AI agents have perception? I'm a bit worried they might misunderstand me.
Injective ecosystem has a new development again, with 1.5 million, not sure what it will turn into.
Raising funds is easy, but truly scalable projects are rare.
Are these people trying to make AI understand us better or just to harvest profits?
Injective ecosystem is indeed competitive, but how many can truly be implemented?
1.5 million in funding is not small, but the key is whether the product can deliver.
Both AI and emotional aspects—what kind of results can this combo produce?
It sounds nice, but ultimately, it still depends on actual performance.
Perceiving user preferences is interesting, but can it really be achieved technically?