A corporate invoice worth millions of dollars just sitting in a safe is like a fully charged battery that isn't connected—full of energy but unusable. In reality, these receivables often take 30 to 90 days to realize, causing small and medium-sized enterprises to face liquidity challenges. However, by 2025, on-chain technology has gradually transformed this situation. Through invoice tokenization protocols, these paper assets can directly connect to the global liquidity markets, fundamentally achieving asset digitization and value release.
**Level 1: Off-Chain Authenticity Verification**
Tokenization doesn't start with smart contracts but with legal and audit processes. Each invoice entering the system must undergo strict commercial authenticity verification. This step is to establish a trust foundation for the assets. Typically, compliant third-party oracles or legal service providers are employed to verify the trade contracts, logistics records, and the debtor’s repayment ability behind the invoice. Only then can the on-chain records correspond to real, existing commercial claims, rather than fictitious certificates.
**Level 2: Legal Framework Construction**
To enable off-chain assets to exist on-chain, legal design is necessary. This usually involves establishing a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) as the legal owner of the on-chain assets. The existence of the SPV ensures the correspondence between off-chain ownership and on-chain tokens, serving as a critical infrastructure for the compliant operation of RWA (Real World Assets). Under current regulatory frameworks, this step is indispensable.
**Level 3: On-Chain Liquidity Activation**
After completing the first two steps, the tokenized invoices can circulate in trading markets. Enterprises can realize accounts receivable early, and investors gain a new type of income asset. This process completely breaks the time gap in traditional finance, revitalizing dormant enterprise assets.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SatoshiNotNakamoto
· 10h ago
Wait, can the SPV setup really hold up? It still seems to depend on how the regulators are going to spin it.
View OriginalReply0
BugBountyHunter
· 10h ago
Sounds good, but in reality, SPV might end up stalling a bunch of projects.
View OriginalReply0
TrustlessMaximalist
· 10h ago
The battery analogy is spot on, but the authenticity verification still feels like a big pitfall. Are oracles reliable?
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 10h ago
Sounds good, but who will bear the burden of this SPV layer? Is it risk transfer or risk concealment?
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 10h ago
Invoice tokenization sounds good, but the key still depends on whether the SPV and oracle are reliable... If there's an issue with off-chain verification, on-chain is useless.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegret
· 10h ago
Invoice tokenization is easy to talk about, but when it comes to implementation, it still gets stuck at the SPV stage. What about domestic regulation? Don't let the on-chain activity become active only to be blocked offline later.
A corporate invoice worth millions of dollars just sitting in a safe is like a fully charged battery that isn't connected—full of energy but unusable. In reality, these receivables often take 30 to 90 days to realize, causing small and medium-sized enterprises to face liquidity challenges. However, by 2025, on-chain technology has gradually transformed this situation. Through invoice tokenization protocols, these paper assets can directly connect to the global liquidity markets, fundamentally achieving asset digitization and value release.
**Level 1: Off-Chain Authenticity Verification**
Tokenization doesn't start with smart contracts but with legal and audit processes. Each invoice entering the system must undergo strict commercial authenticity verification. This step is to establish a trust foundation for the assets. Typically, compliant third-party oracles or legal service providers are employed to verify the trade contracts, logistics records, and the debtor’s repayment ability behind the invoice. Only then can the on-chain records correspond to real, existing commercial claims, rather than fictitious certificates.
**Level 2: Legal Framework Construction**
To enable off-chain assets to exist on-chain, legal design is necessary. This usually involves establishing a Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) as the legal owner of the on-chain assets. The existence of the SPV ensures the correspondence between off-chain ownership and on-chain tokens, serving as a critical infrastructure for the compliant operation of RWA (Real World Assets). Under current regulatory frameworks, this step is indispensable.
**Level 3: On-Chain Liquidity Activation**
After completing the first two steps, the tokenized invoices can circulate in trading markets. Enterprises can realize accounts receivable early, and investors gain a new type of income asset. This process completely breaks the time gap in traditional finance, revitalizing dormant enterprise assets.