Still ignoring the upheaval of stablecoins? Then you might not be truly prepared for the next market cycle. Currently, there are teams building infrastructure to connect traditional finance with on-chain liquidity, filling a long-standing gap.
The changes brought about by this technology are very direct—former skeptics are gradually becoming participants. From the perspective of stablecoins, you either keep up with the pace of evolution or fall behind. What’s your view?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullProphet
· 9h ago
Traditional finance is really about to stir things up; stablecoins need to move quickly.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropAutomaton
· 12h ago
The issue of stablecoins, someone should have built the infrastructure long ago. TradFi has been holding it back all along.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 12h ago
Stablecoins definitely deserve more attention, but honestly, many projects are still just on paper; only a few are truly capable.
The key is the attitude change on the traditional finance side. Once policies loosen up genuinely, the track will explode.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBuster
· 12h ago
If you still sleep through this wave of stablecoins, there's really no hope. Traditional finance connecting to the blockchain is an inevitable trend.
View OriginalReply0
CounterIndicator
· 12h ago
Stablecoins do have a chance for a turnaround, but really don't overhype it. The traditional finance folks coming in are not here for a revolution; they're just here to harvest profits.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkeptic
· 12h ago
The upheaval in stablecoins is truly unavoidable now, even those traditional financial giants who previously refused to touch on-chain assets are now eager to get involved.
View OriginalReply0
ZKSherlock
· 12h ago
actually... the trust assumptions baked into these "traditional finance connectors" are precisely what nobody's asking about. what cryptographic primitives are we even using here? zero-knowledge proofs? or just... more opacity with a shiny infrastructure label slapped on?
Still ignoring the upheaval of stablecoins? Then you might not be truly prepared for the next market cycle. Currently, there are teams building infrastructure to connect traditional finance with on-chain liquidity, filling a long-standing gap.
The changes brought about by this technology are very direct—former skeptics are gradually becoming participants. From the perspective of stablecoins, you either keep up with the pace of evolution or fall behind. What’s your view?