What strikes me about SCOR Protocol is how the team refuses to stop there after getting listed. They keep building the narrative through both the technical layer and the community side—the infrastructure keeps expanding while the fan economy thrives. That's the real play.
For myself, I've locked in one principle: document everything first, understand what works, then engineer the product around it. It's the opposite of shipping fast and breaking things. Record, learn, build—in that order.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 14h ago
Hey, I really respect this logic. It's much better than those projects that just lay flat after going public.
View OriginalReply0
gaslight_gasfeez
· 14h ago
Continuing to compete in infrastructure even after going public—that's true endurance.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirector
· 14h ago
It is true that the process of learning and building this system has been documented, but most teams just can't wait and are eager to issue tokens to harvest profits.
What strikes me about SCOR Protocol is how the team refuses to stop there after getting listed. They keep building the narrative through both the technical layer and the community side—the infrastructure keeps expanding while the fan economy thrives. That's the real play.
For myself, I've locked in one principle: document everything first, understand what works, then engineer the product around it. It's the opposite of shipping fast and breaking things. Record, learn, build—in that order.