Not every ICO struggles due to valuation issues, poor timing, or flawed tokenomics. That's the surface-level explanation most people lean on.
Look at other projects—some managed to find buyers even in similar market conditions. Take ZKpass as an example; it navigated the same landscape differently.
The real problem? Platform saturation among core users. The most engaged community members were already stretched too thin, holding too many tokens, farming on too many protocols. They'd hit their capacity.
When your most active users can't absorb new allocations, it becomes nearly impossible to build momentum. These aren't passive holders; they're the ones who drive adoption, provide liquidity, and create visibility. Once they're maxed out, spreading the word to fresh capital becomes exponentially harder.
It's less about the project's fundamentals and more about the ecosystem's current user bandwidth.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StopLossMaster
· 12h ago
Well said. I hadn't considered the point of core user saturation before. A bunch of people are simultaneously farming multiple projects, and with a wallet of that size, it's indeed impossible to expand and attract new users.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 12h ago
Nah, this perspective is interesting. I hadn't considered this kind of bottleneck before. But to be honest, the real issue is probably that the project itself isn't attractive...
View OriginalReply0
ILCollector
· 12h ago
The core users have all been drained; that's the real problem.
View OriginalReply0
UnruggableChad
· 12h ago
Core users have fully invested; no matter how good the new project is, no one will take over. It's that simple.
View OriginalReply0
Lonely_Validator
· 12h ago
The core users have all been drained; that's the real problem.
Not every ICO struggles due to valuation issues, poor timing, or flawed tokenomics. That's the surface-level explanation most people lean on.
Look at other projects—some managed to find buyers even in similar market conditions. Take ZKpass as an example; it navigated the same landscape differently.
The real problem? Platform saturation among core users. The most engaged community members were already stretched too thin, holding too many tokens, farming on too many protocols. They'd hit their capacity.
When your most active users can't absorb new allocations, it becomes nearly impossible to build momentum. These aren't passive holders; they're the ones who drive adoption, provide liquidity, and create visibility. Once they're maxed out, spreading the word to fresh capital becomes exponentially harder.
It's less about the project's fundamentals and more about the ecosystem's current user bandwidth.