To be honest, the current project routines on BSC are basically the same.
First, a small group sets up the project, then starts calling for people to join. After retail funds flood in, they suddenly dump to zero. At this point, insiders can hold on and turn around to pump again. When the price rises, they start hyping how awesome the project is. Cycle repeats.
It seems simple, but why do retail investors always get cut? The key lies in the size of the liquidity pool. When the pool is so small that only the project team’s small group can afford to manipulate it, the price is entirely at their mercy. Want to escape? There’s no liquidity left to sell.
So don’t be fooled by how much someone has made. They can walk away unscathed not because they have better insight, but because they hold the power to drain the pool. And for us retail investors, from the moment we enter, we’re already trapped in a no-exit trap.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirDropMissed
· 2025-12-31 01:05
It's the same old trick again, I'm tired of seeing it.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 2025-12-31 00:14
It's the same old trick again. After watching it so many times, I still want to complain... The liquidity is simply not enough, and we lost from the very beginning.
A lesson in total loss: the smaller the pool, the more concentrated the power. By the time you want to escape, it's too late.
Who to blame? It's all greed, insisting on going all-in on a small coin.
Did I learn to be smarter this time? I definitely didn't... I got liquidated again.
That previous project was the same; insiders had already set the liquidation price, and retail investors like us had no risk control points.
The tactics are simple, but when it comes to execution, we're always the big fools.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHero
· 2025-12-30 15:25
It has proven that the size of the liquidity pool directly determines pricing power, which is a security risk in the protocol architecture. Retail investors have always been passive.
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 2025-12-30 09:14
Is the pool so small that you still go in? Did your brain get caught in the door, haha
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 2025-12-28 04:55
Wake up, everyone. This is the current standard operation, nothing more to say.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropBlackHole
· 2025-12-28 04:55
It's the same old story, seen it too many times. Small pools are just like this; we're always the ones to be slaughtered.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 2025-12-28 04:54
Damn it, it's the same old trick again. I keep falling for it every time.
View OriginalReply0
RugDocDetective
· 2025-12-28 04:54
I'm already tired of this routine; it's always the same script every time.
View OriginalReply0
GoldDiggerDuck
· 2025-12-28 04:30
It's the same old story, I've seen it too many times. It's really time to wake up.
To be honest, the current project routines on BSC are basically the same.
First, a small group sets up the project, then starts calling for people to join. After retail funds flood in, they suddenly dump to zero. At this point, insiders can hold on and turn around to pump again. When the price rises, they start hyping how awesome the project is. Cycle repeats.
It seems simple, but why do retail investors always get cut? The key lies in the size of the liquidity pool. When the pool is so small that only the project team’s small group can afford to manipulate it, the price is entirely at their mercy. Want to escape? There’s no liquidity left to sell.
So don’t be fooled by how much someone has made. They can walk away unscathed not because they have better insight, but because they hold the power to drain the pool. And for us retail investors, from the moment we enter, we’re already trapped in a no-exit trap.