Recently, a 1 billion token burn event by a certain DEX has been making headlines, and many are discussing the significance of this move. Instead of following the crowd with comments, let me tell you an interesting story.



Imagine a boss who runs a limited edition doll business. His dolls become popular, and the market follows suit, driving prices sky-high. Business is booming, but then a problem arises—his inventory piles up, and if he dumps these goods into the market, prices will crash immediately. What should he do?

The clever boss comes up with a solution: burning tokens. But the method of burning is quite particular—every time a customer buys a doll from his store, they pay a fee. This fee cannot be secretly pocketed according to the rules and must be handled differently. So, the boss uses these fees to buy back his own inventory of dolls, ostensibly to destroy circulating products, but in reality, real money still flows into the boss’s own account.

This logic can also apply to certain token projects. On the surface, burning indeed reduces circulation, but the source of the reflowed funds and the true cost of burning are details worth pondering. The market always tests human nature, and what we need to do is see through the real story behind the numbers.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
SingleForYearsvip
· 11h ago
Basically, it's just a different way to cut the leeks again, with transaction fees going back into the project's pocket. This trick has been played out in the crypto world.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBrovip
· 11h ago
It's just another scam to destroy, with fees going into the boss's pocket—I've seen through this trick a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
TokenUnlockervip
· 11h ago
I've seen this trick many times. Basically, it's just changing the name to pocket the money again—there's no way they're destroying it.
View OriginalReply0
AlwaysQuestioningvip
· 11h ago
Wait, the logic sounds good, but the real question is—who can verify the true cost of the burn? On-chain data can also be faked.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiaovip
· 11h ago
Haha, I've seen this trick many times. To put it simply, it's just your left hand giving to your right hand... The transaction fees are burned, but the money ultimately flows back into your own pocket. Is this what you call "conscientious burning"?
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffeevip
· 11h ago
Basically, it's the same old trick, just a new way to cut the leeks. Destruction, buyback, deflation... they all sound great, but the underlying logic is just putting money from the left pocket into the right pocket. Where is the real value? No sign of it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)