The mechanism design of this project is quite interesting. The zero-cost token burn model is indeed more elegant from an economic perspective compared to traditional inflation schemes—it can achieve token recovery without imposing additional burdens on users. Compared to projects that simply burn or buy back tokens, this design approach is indeed more imaginative.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullAlarmvip
· 17h ago
Alright, don't rush to praise yet. I need to see how that "zero cost" is achieved in the contract—usually, there's some hidden fund flow behind such claims.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpyvip
· 17h ago
Zero-cost coin burning sounds suspicious. Can it really prevent getting chopped?
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhalevip
· 17h ago
Zero-cost token burning sounds good, but how does it work in practice? It still feels like someone has to foot the bill.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvicevip
· 17h ago
Zero-cost coin burning? Sounds outrageous, there's no such thing as a free lunch in this world.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)