The mechanism design of this project is quite interesting. The zero-cost token burn model is indeed more elegant from an economic perspective compared to traditional inflation schemes—it can achieve token recovery without imposing additional burdens on users. Compared to projects that simply burn or buy back tokens, this design approach is indeed more imaginative.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullAlarm
· 17h ago
Alright, don't rush to praise yet. I need to see how that "zero cost" is achieved in the contract—usually, there's some hidden fund flow behind such claims.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpy
· 17h ago
Zero-cost coin burning sounds suspicious. Can it really prevent getting chopped?
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 17h ago
Zero-cost token burning sounds good, but how does it work in practice? It still feels like someone has to foot the bill.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdvice
· 17h ago
Zero-cost coin burning? Sounds outrageous, there's no such thing as a free lunch in this world.
The mechanism design of this project is quite interesting. The zero-cost token burn model is indeed more elegant from an economic perspective compared to traditional inflation schemes—it can achieve token recovery without imposing additional burdens on users. Compared to projects that simply burn or buy back tokens, this design approach is indeed more imaginative.