#加密市场行情走势 Looking at this Web3 startup story really triggered my deep reflection on the risks of a bear market.

From the highlight moments of Loois with over two hundred people on-site at the press conference and ten thousand viewers live streaming, to the eventual collapse of the funding chain and team disbandment—this process is actually a portrayal of the "project life cycle" that most crypto enthusiasts overlook.

The key points are:

**1. Funding difficulties are an early warning sign.** No matter how excellent the product is, if funding cools down and investors start saying "the project is good but we’re not investing now," this is not politeness; the market has already judged the direction. In a bear market, even the best products cannot sell "certainty," so fundraising is basically a lost cause.

**2. Self-sustainability determines life or death.** Loois’s fatal flaw was not in technology but in dependence on other revenue streams. When that profitable business line suddenly loses blood, the pressure immediately transmits to the product team. This tells us that projects we participate in must be able to make money on their own, rather than relying on fundraising and growth.

**3. The bear market doesn’t destroy you overnight; it slowly eats away at your confidence like a tide.** Delayed salaries → team updates resumes → communication chaos → morale collapse—that process is irreversible.

The lesson for us crypto enthusiasts is: when choosing projects, look carefully at funding status, team morale, and cash flow—not just how big the whitepaper’s pie chart looks. High-profile projects are often the easiest to fall into traps. Projects that survive in a bear market are actually worth paying long-term attention to.