Mezo's veBTC yield performance is steady and low-key. There are no dramatic surges or crashes, purely driven by the protocol's genuine fees—this sustainable revenue structure is actually what long-term players value. Interestingly, even though the TVL has reached its limit, the growth momentum has not stalled, and funds continue to flow in. Short-term locked participants may have quickly jumped on board, but to experience deeper compound yield effects, long-term locking and continuous investment are the right strategies. This design logic encourages users' long-term commitment and also enhances the protocol's stability.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVEyevip
· 6h ago
A steady income is often talked about, but the key is whether it can truly outpace inflation. The veBTC locking mechanism this time really has some substance. --- The TVL cap is still attracting money. It seems the market still buys into this complex logic. --- Only long-term locking can yield sweet results. Those who enter and exit early probably regret it already haha. --- No sudden surges or crashes, and it's even more stable? I always feel this might be the real risk signal... --- Revenue driven by fees sounds solid, but could it just be another way of saying profit margins are limited? --- Funds keep pouring in, and the TVL can still be capped. I’m a bit confused by this logic. --- This design traps short-term players, while the long-term ones are the real winners. --- Steady is steady, but the question is how much real cash can be actually obtained.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropJunkievip
· 8h ago
Steady returns sound good, but when it comes to actual cost drivers... it depends on how long it takes to break even. Long-term lock-up investors make money, but aren't we just short-term traders or "leeks"? People still rush even when TVL hits the cap? That shows strong confidence. The so-called compound interest effect sounds nice, but you still need to invest money to see real gains. People keep talking about sustainability, but the real skill is breaking through the TVL ceiling.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Sevenvip
· 8h ago
Honestly, things that are straightforward and driven purely by real costs are actually more reassuring? Unlike those that skyrocket overnight and scare me into sleepless nights. Long-term viability is real, but here's the problem—since the TVL cap is fixed, do latecomers have to wait for an opportunity? Or are they already working on optimizing something?
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 8h ago
Real cost-driven returns, that's what I love—no unnecessary fluff. Long-term locking definitely requires a tough mindset; the compound effect is powerful. The TVL ceiling can still be exploited, indicating that some people are truly optimistic about this. Speaking of which, this kind of low-key growth is much more reliable than sudden surges and crashes—it's a test of patience.
View OriginalReply0
SquidTeachervip
· 8h ago
Steady returns don't get attention; only a 50% monthly increase makes it to the trending list. That's the reality. Long-term locking? Basically, it's a gamble on the protocol lasting long enough. I still don't trust it. People are still throwing money at TVL peaks. Is it real, or is someone just taking over? With this kind of compound return, how long do you have to lock in to see the principal? Feels not as good as you guys say. It looks low-key and steady, but actually it's just not moving up anymore. Don't overhype it.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)