TauntCoin's Mindo Shark Arena has recently launched a 2-month on-chain PVP competition with a total prize pool of $60,000, releasing $30,000 each month.



This design is quite interesting. The project team did not follow the common route of large capital whales battling it out; instead, they intentionally targeted a different competitive dimension—focusing on active retail investors and strategic players, effectively opening up a new competitive space. This approach is especially practical for startups: attracting highly engaged users with relatively controllable costs and quickly building a core community.

From the participation perspective, the competition emphasizes strategy and activity rather than capital size, giving more ordinary players a sense of involvement. The monthly release schedule extends the user lifecycle, alleviating liquidity pressure on the project team and providing participants with opportunities to profit in stages. For projects aiming for rapid cold start and genuine user accumulation, such competitive activities are highly effective.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
screenshot_gainsvip
· 9h ago
Yes, this set of logic is indeed clever, and I agree with the concept of misaligned competition.
View OriginalReply0
VirtualRichDreamvip
· 9h ago
$60,000 sounds like a lot, but spreading it out over two months to extend the battle line—this approach really has some tricks up its sleeve. Not playing the whale game, but instead attracting retail investors? That’s a smart move. For strategic players, having a sense of participation is key; at least it’s not a game purely based on capital. This kind of competition is like a life-saving potion for cold-start projects. Real users are worth much more than fake data. Releasing funds in monthly batches helps ease liquidity pressure and gives participants a breather—it's a win-win design. Compared to projects that dump all the prize pool at once and then disappear, this pace looks much more solid.
View OriginalReply0
failed_dev_successful_apevip
· 9h ago
The prize pool of 60,000 is split into 30,000 each month. This pace is indeed very steady. I like the competitive design aimed at retail investors; it's much more enjoyable than those whale games.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapyvip
· 9h ago
A prize pool of $60,000 is a bit small, to be honest, but this idea is truly brilliant. However, I'm just worried it will become another scheme to harvest profits from newcomers.
View OriginalReply0
TokenAlchemistvip
· 9h ago
ngl the monthly drip is classic retention mechanics... they're basically optimizing for tvl stickiness without needing whale capital. inefficiency vector nobody's talking about though - what happens to dust positions when liquidation cascades hit mid-tournament? 💀
Reply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)