2025-12-28 13:36:15

Looking at this data comparison, the true strength gap among exchanges is clear at a glance.

A leading exchange has a reserve scale of 165974M, far ahead of the entire field. How exaggerated is this number? To put it another way, its fund pool size is nearly 10 times that of the second-ranked OKX (17532M). In terms of fund security and risk resistance, the gap is right here.

Interestingly, the subsequent group shows a clear echelon effect. Exchanges like OKX, Bitget, and Bybit have reserve amounts concentrated between 5917M and 17532M, each competing within the same level. Although their scale is not as large as the top players, they have also established their own competitive moats.

For users, the essence reflected by this data is: when choosing an exchange, reserve scale is indeed a key indicator. The thicker the reserves, the stronger the platform’s buffer capacity to handle black swan events. From this perspective, liquidity and safety coefficients have quantifiable references.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
1
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PessimisticLayer

· 5h ago

10x gap? If that were true, I’d believe it. Anyway, I’m still sticking to my few. --- No matter how loud the reserve fund hype gets, it’s useless. The key is the withdrawal speed—that’s the real test. --- Whoa, 165974M? Are you sure you didn’t miss a zero? --- Just listen, don’t take it too seriously. Exchange data has always been... "selectively transparent." --- The obvious echelon effect, huh? Then why do exchanges keep collapsing? That logic doesn’t add up. --- They’re back to talking about reserve funds. If something really happens, it probably won’t help much. --- It’s impossible to prevent black swan events; history has proven that many times. --- Forget it, anyway, risk needs to be diversified. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket.

View OriginalReply0