After reviewing many protocol revenue data comparisons, I found that the sources vary quite a bit, and some data platforms do have a lot of inflated figures.
In terms of public chain protocol revenue, TRON's performance is quite stable—almost every month maintaining a level of 30-60M, and it has been quite solid from the beginning of the year until now. In comparison, Solana, although it once reached a peak of 120M in January, then declined and has not returned to that level since.
The reasons behind these differences are quite interesting and may involve protocol mechanism adjustments or market cycle fluctuations. But the most straightforward conclusion is: if you want to rely on data, you really need to spend more time verifying the data sources; blindly citing data can easily lead to mistakes. Before comparing data, it's important to look at multiple dimensions.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SchroedingersFrontrun
· 17h ago
TRON's stability is indeed impressive; it feels underrated. That 120M wave on Solana was like a fireworks show, coming quickly and fading just as fast. And now some people are still bragging about that data.
View OriginalReply0
ZkProofPudding
· 17h ago
TRON's stability is indeed impressive, unlike some public chains that come and go like a passing breeze.
Consistently earning 30-60M per month makes it feel more reliable... After Solana's peak of 120M, there’s been no news, which is honestly a bit outrageous.
Data really needs to be dug into oneself; too many platforms are misleading.
That's why I don't put much trust in certain rankings... it's necessary to compare multiple sources.
Can protocol revenue and TVL be looked at the same way? You need to analyze them together with the mechanism; that's the core.
View OriginalReply0
FrontRunFighter
· 17h ago
ngl tron's consistent 30-60m is lowkey sus... what's really behind that stability? feels like someone's gaming the metrics here
Reply0
NervousFingers
· 17h ago
TRON's stability is truly exceptional, much more reliable than the ups and downs of SOL.
After reviewing many protocol revenue data comparisons, I found that the sources vary quite a bit, and some data platforms do have a lot of inflated figures.
In terms of public chain protocol revenue, TRON's performance is quite stable—almost every month maintaining a level of 30-60M, and it has been quite solid from the beginning of the year until now. In comparison, Solana, although it once reached a peak of 120M in January, then declined and has not returned to that level since.
The reasons behind these differences are quite interesting and may involve protocol mechanism adjustments or market cycle fluctuations. But the most straightforward conclusion is: if you want to rely on data, you really need to spend more time verifying the data sources; blindly citing data can easily lead to mistakes. Before comparing data, it's important to look at multiple dimensions.