2025-12-28 15:15:14

Trading data of a new project in the Solana ecosystem is worth paying attention to. According to on-chain data, the token's buy order trading volume within 24 hours reached $593, while the sell order trading volume was $517, indicating relatively balanced trading. The current liquidity pool size is $21,360, with a market cap of approximately $51,751. Such small-cap tokens tend to be highly volatile, with relatively limited liquidity, so investors should carefully assess the risks. Interested traders can use professional on-chain data tools to view more detailed price trends and technical indicators, but be sure to implement proper risk management and position control.

SOL3,35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

4 Likes

Reward
4
2
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

WagmiOrRekt

· 13h ago

With such low liquidity in small-cap, how do you play? Just buy in all at once and push it to the max.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentTherapist

· 13h ago

Buy and sell only 76 dollars apart, this market is so small it's unbelievable --- Once again, it's a low-liquidity altcoin. No matter how this wave goes, we need to build some psychological resilience --- With a market cap of over fifty thousand, what risk management are we talking about? This is just a gamble --- $21k pool... let's not deceive ourselves, this is a dumping scene --- Bro, it's strange that buy and sell are so balanced. Is this normal? --- Small-cap coins are all like this; today's traffic is gone tomorrow --- Risk management? It's a bit funny in front of such coins --- Only this much volume in 24 hours, how bored do you have to be to watch this? --- 51k market cap... I feel embarrassed for this project --- Another new star in the Solana ecosystem, can it survive more than three months this time?

View OriginalReply0