The issue of the Federal Reserve Chair's successor is becoming a key variable in the financial markets. The differences between Trump and the current leadership on economic policy have already surfaced—former leaning towards short-term liquidity releases to stimulate the stock market, while the latter needs to maintain policy stability and neutrality under inflationary pressures. The outcome of this tug-of-war will directly determine the market's operational logic in the coming years: whether to return to a loose monetary cycle or to continue enduring high interest rate pressures.
Several popular candidates are closely watched by the market. Kevin Hasset, as a veteran in policy circles, may signal a more aggressive rate cut if he takes the helm of the Fed. Kevin Waugh is gaining more recognition on Wall Street, with the market believing he can better uphold the independence boundaries of the Federal Reserve. Christopher Waller, as the current board member,’s policy inclination is also under scrutiny. The market has already priced in these possibilities, and the real concern is: the cornerstone of the Fed’s independent decision-making for nearly a century is facing an unprecedented challenge. Historical experience tells us that when monetary policy evolves into a political tool, both market volatility and long-term economic stability are at risk.
From a trading perspective, there are three dimensions worth paying attention to. First, policy signals around January 2026 will become key triggers for the market. Second, this power struggle further reinforces a narrative: in an era where traditional financial credit foundations are being shaken, the hedging value of decentralized assets is increasingly prominent. Digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, serving as liquidity pools and safe havens beyond policy interventions, will gradually gain attractiveness. Lastly, in an environment of rising macro uncertainty, the stability of core holdings is crucial—avoiding being swayed by short-term fluctuations and sticking to mainstream cryptocurrencies is the strategy to navigate the changing landscape.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ThreeHornBlasts
· 7h ago
The Fed's power game this time is really impressive. Basically, it's a gamble on who can come to power and give more opportunities to the crypto world.
The Federal Reserve has turned into a political battleground. What should we retail investors do? Just hold onto mainstream coins and be patient.
If Hasset really pushes for aggressive rate cuts, Bitcoin will be excited... but we also need to watch out for reversals.
The politicization of policy tools is indeed dangerous. After traditional financial credit collapses, you realize why it's important to hold some crypto assets.
That declaration in 2026... Honestly, I'm more concerned about the market in Q2 next year. Things that are too far away are hard to predict.
Wall Street actually just wants stability, but Trump wants to loosen policies. This contradiction will eventually intensify, and safe-haven assets will become popular.
Wosh's emphasis on maintaining independence sounds good, but the market still relies on liquidity. What's the point of independence?
Rather than worrying about who will take power, it's better to think about how to survive in this wave of uncertainty. Mainstream coins are still good for defense.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedAgain
· 7h ago
Coming again? I've heard the story of the Fed's independence too many times, and in the end, it still depends on the political climate. In 2023, I was liquidated once because I bet against the trend, and that painful lesson... Now, looking at these candidate battles, I just want to say, before bottom fishing, calculate your liquidation price first, and don't get liquidated after going all in like I did.
View OriginalReply0
ChainComedian
· 7h ago
The Federal Reserve has become a political pawn; this will inevitably lead to problems sooner or later.
Trump wants to loosen policies to stimulate the stock market, while Powell still aims to stabilize inflation... It's too outrageous.
The very existence of Bitcoin highlights the fact that traditional financial credit is truly collapsing.
Around January 2026, this will be the real focus.
Whether it's easing or tightening, it affects our wallets.
Decentralized assets have truly become the last fortress.
Instead of betting on politicians' intentions, it's better to hold some BTC to keep calm.
Hold your mainstream coins well and don't be fooled by short-term fluctuations.
In this game, the ultimate winners are those who don't trust the system.
View OriginalReply0
FancyResearchLab
· 7h ago
In theory, the independence of the Federal Reserve should be maintained, but in reality, this thing has long been a joke. Hasset taking office is just putting political tools on his face.
Wait, is this logic again brainwashing the crypto circle? Inflation pressure → policy uncertainty → buy BTC, we've already been cut once by this set of reasoning.
Trigger point in 2026? Alright, I'll do a small experiment first to see if this wave of policy drama can really move liquidity.
The stability of mainstream cryptocurrencies is the most important. To put it nicely, it’s actually just about not buying scam coins and getting caught. I agree with this point.
View OriginalReply0
governance_lurker
· 7h ago
Is the Federal Reserve's independence broken? The crypto world is about to take off!
The issue of the Federal Reserve Chair's successor is becoming a key variable in the financial markets. The differences between Trump and the current leadership on economic policy have already surfaced—former leaning towards short-term liquidity releases to stimulate the stock market, while the latter needs to maintain policy stability and neutrality under inflationary pressures. The outcome of this tug-of-war will directly determine the market's operational logic in the coming years: whether to return to a loose monetary cycle or to continue enduring high interest rate pressures.
Several popular candidates are closely watched by the market. Kevin Hasset, as a veteran in policy circles, may signal a more aggressive rate cut if he takes the helm of the Fed. Kevin Waugh is gaining more recognition on Wall Street, with the market believing he can better uphold the independence boundaries of the Federal Reserve. Christopher Waller, as the current board member,’s policy inclination is also under scrutiny. The market has already priced in these possibilities, and the real concern is: the cornerstone of the Fed’s independent decision-making for nearly a century is facing an unprecedented challenge. Historical experience tells us that when monetary policy evolves into a political tool, both market volatility and long-term economic stability are at risk.
From a trading perspective, there are three dimensions worth paying attention to. First, policy signals around January 2026 will become key triggers for the market. Second, this power struggle further reinforces a narrative: in an era where traditional financial credit foundations are being shaken, the hedging value of decentralized assets is increasingly prominent. Digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, serving as liquidity pools and safe havens beyond policy interventions, will gradually gain attractiveness. Lastly, in an environment of rising macro uncertainty, the stability of core holdings is crucial—avoiding being swayed by short-term fluctuations and sticking to mainstream cryptocurrencies is the strategy to navigate the changing landscape.