Just look at this week's data to see how outrageous it is—The Federal Reserve directly purchased $6.8 billion in government bonds, the U.S. Treasury injected $70.5 billion into the market in liquidity over a week, with daily liquidity injections reaching as high as $17.75 billion. Meanwhile, China's central bank is not idle either, releasing liquidity in waves totaling 86.27 billion yuan.
Logically, with so much money flowing in, Bitcoin should break previous highs, and altcoins should soar. But the reality is a bit awkward—the crypto market is as still as water.
Why is this happening? The reason is straightforward and painfully simple: just "printing money" is no longer enough.
In the past, cryptocurrencies and liquidity thrived together, but that’s long gone. Now, the main drivers are emotional fluctuations, regulatory winds, and whether blockchain applications can truly be implemented. The current market is weighed down by three major obstacles: the previous gains are still being digested (profit-taking is heavy), macroeconomic rate cut expectations fluctuate (funds are uncertain), and geopolitical tensions occasionally produce black swan events.
These investors have learned a profound lesson—central bank liquidity can provide emergency relief but cannot sustain a bull market. Once confidence collapses, pouring more money in is useless, like pouring water into sand—it just seeps away and disappears.
The growth drivers for cryptocurrencies have changed:
In the short term, sentiment and policy signals dominate; in the medium term, real user adoption and trading activity are needed; in the long term, it depends on how global capital reallocates flows.
To see the crypto market truly take off, three things must happen together: "central bank liquidity injection + institutional risk-taking + active on-chain user engagement." We are now in a volatile era, waiting for the next clear signal—perhaps regulatory easing, maybe big institutions sweeping in, or a sudden explosion of an application on a certain chain.
Ultimately, liquidity is just the stage being set; the real story depends on the ecosystem itself to perform.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GweiWatcher
· 13h ago
The central bank is flooding the market aggressively, but the crypto circle is still dozing off. It's really starting to become unsustainable.
Confidence is gone; no matter how much money is added, it's just feeding an insatiable monster.
Only when institutions truly dare to step out will it be a real signal.
View OriginalReply0
MemeCurator
· 13h ago
Throwing money around without delivering, I'm tired of this routine
The central bank's faucet has been turned on, but our wallets are still empty
Only when someone truly dares to all-in will it count, I guess
View OriginalReply0
CryptoNomics
· 13h ago
actually, if you run a basic correlation matrix on fed liquidity injections vs. btc price action, the r-squared is laughably weak. people keep confusing monetary policy with actual market structure. sentiment doesn't trade—flow mechanics do.
Reply0
GhostWalletSleuth
· 13h ago
In simple terms, it's shattered confidence; no matter how much money there is, it's useless.
---
The central bank is flooding the market with money, but no one is on the chain? Isn't that just a stage with no actors?
---
Liquidity issues have long been outdated. Now, it's about who dares to sweep up and who has real applications.
---
Waiting every day for regulatory easing and institutional bets is pointless; instead, think about how to make ordinary people truly active on the chain.
---
The analogy of pouring water on sand is perfect; it describes the current situation.
---
The recent movements of ZEC, SOL, and FLOW didn't reflect liquidity expectations, indicating that market sentiment has really changed.
---
In my opinion, instead of obsessing over central bank data, it's better to wait for a certain application to suddenly explode in popularity.
---
Heavy profit-taking pressure, combined with geopolitical black swans, makes even abundant liquidity worthless.
---
Right now, this industry is just waiting for the next signal; no one dares to take the lead and charge.
#美联储回购协议计划 Central banks around the world are flooding the market with money, so why is cryptocurrency remaining stagnant?
$ZEC $SOL $FLOW
Just look at this week's data to see how outrageous it is—The Federal Reserve directly purchased $6.8 billion in government bonds, the U.S. Treasury injected $70.5 billion into the market in liquidity over a week, with daily liquidity injections reaching as high as $17.75 billion. Meanwhile, China's central bank is not idle either, releasing liquidity in waves totaling 86.27 billion yuan.
Logically, with so much money flowing in, Bitcoin should break previous highs, and altcoins should soar. But the reality is a bit awkward—the crypto market is as still as water.
Why is this happening? The reason is straightforward and painfully simple: just "printing money" is no longer enough.
In the past, cryptocurrencies and liquidity thrived together, but that’s long gone. Now, the main drivers are emotional fluctuations, regulatory winds, and whether blockchain applications can truly be implemented. The current market is weighed down by three major obstacles: the previous gains are still being digested (profit-taking is heavy), macroeconomic rate cut expectations fluctuate (funds are uncertain), and geopolitical tensions occasionally produce black swan events.
These investors have learned a profound lesson—central bank liquidity can provide emergency relief but cannot sustain a bull market. Once confidence collapses, pouring more money in is useless, like pouring water into sand—it just seeps away and disappears.
The growth drivers for cryptocurrencies have changed:
In the short term, sentiment and policy signals dominate; in the medium term, real user adoption and trading activity are needed; in the long term, it depends on how global capital reallocates flows.
To see the crypto market truly take off, three things must happen together: "central bank liquidity injection + institutional risk-taking + active on-chain user engagement." We are now in a volatile era, waiting for the next clear signal—perhaps regulatory easing, maybe big institutions sweeping in, or a sudden explosion of an application on a certain chain.
Ultimately, liquidity is just the stage being set; the real story depends on the ecosystem itself to perform.