The governance voting for World Liberty Financial is finally here. What are the key points of this vote? The officials plan to use a portion of the unlocked WLFI treasury funds to accelerate the adoption and ecosystem development of USD1 through targeted incentives. In other words, they are using real money to gain market share. Interested community members can now participate in the voting and directly influence the project's future development pace. This type of governance mechanism is becoming more common in DeFi, and the community's voice is gaining more weight. Do you think this incentive strategy can effectively promote user growth for USD1?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoWageSlave
· 9h ago
Real money for market share, this trick has been played out in the crypto world long ago
Incentives are poured in, users rush to rise, but retention rate... haha
This voting mechanism sounds democratic, but in reality, it's still the big players calling the shots
Can USD1 go viral? I'm a bit skeptical
Targeted incentives are just disguised airdrops, why dress it up so fancy
Community influence rising? First, see how many people will actually participate in voting
Another game of big capital, as workers, it's safer to just watch
Incentives are incentives, but product strength is the real key, brother
View OriginalReply0
MoonRocketman
· 9h ago
Treasury fueling, USD1 launch countdown has begun. The key is whether the incentives can break through the gravitational resistance level, directly affecting the escape velocity.
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinArbitrageur
· 9h ago
Using real money to gain market share, I've seen this trick too many times. The key is whether you can retain users.
---
Voting rights are dispersed, and final decisions still depend on how big players vote.
---
Incentive strategies... In the early stages, they can definitely attract new users, but retention is the real skill.
---
I'm a bit curious where this treasury fund came from. Is it another new way to cut leeks?
---
I've seen too many of these targeted incentives; in the end, they all turn into empty hype with impressive data.
---
Community governance sounds great, but in reality, it still depends on whether the development team is willing to listen.
---
USD1 wants to create a stablecoin? It depends on whether USDT and USDC will give the opportunity.
---
Participants in voting are all long-term holders; newcomers have no say at all. That's quite ironic.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentLossFan
· 9h ago
Again, spending money to gain market share. I'm tired of this routine.
---
As for governance voting, honestly, it all depends on how much real gold and silver is left in the treasury.
---
Whether the incentive strategy can work depends on whether there is genuine demand for USD1 itself. Spending money can only buy temporary popularity.
---
The key is whether there are many participants in the voting; otherwise, a few big players will still have the final say.
---
Haha, another DeFi project using incentives to save itself. Is ecosystem construction really that simple?
---
It seems that this kind of targeted incentive ultimately flows to the top wallets. How much can ordinary community members share?
View OriginalReply0
GmGmNoGn
· 10h ago
Real money for market share—I've seen this trick too many times
---
Holding voting rights feels good, but the key is whether the incentives will actually be implemented in the end
---
The incentive strategy sounds good, but I'm just worried that pouring money in will result in no results
---
Community governance is essentially just big players calling the shots, don't be too naive
---
If you ask me, instead of incentivizing, it's better to focus on improving the product experience first
---
This move is a bit like betting that USD1 will become popular; how long can the treasury keep pouring money in?
---
Just vote, anyway, no matter how you choose, it's all capital playing a game
The governance voting for World Liberty Financial is finally here. What are the key points of this vote? The officials plan to use a portion of the unlocked WLFI treasury funds to accelerate the adoption and ecosystem development of USD1 through targeted incentives. In other words, they are using real money to gain market share. Interested community members can now participate in the voting and directly influence the project's future development pace. This type of governance mechanism is becoming more common in DeFi, and the community's voice is gaining more weight. Do you think this incentive strategy can effectively promote user growth for USD1?