A few days ago, I was still pondering how to hedge against the downside risk of USDT, and then the market gave me an answer. I unexpectedly came across an interesting idea—using stablecoins to enhance returns and offset the impact of declines. Out of curiosity, I wanted to ask if it can be implemented using Web3 methods, such as through liquidity mining or lending mechanisms on certain DeFi platforms.
The key question is, does this logic really work on-chain? Can the yields cover the risks? Or is it just an ideal concept in theory?🤔
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
WhaleInTraining
· 1h ago
To be honest, this idea sounds good, but in practice, it's often just empty talk.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMonger
· 12h ago
lol the classic "yield farming will save me" narrative. most of these defi hedges collapse the moment governance gets attacked or liquidity dries up—nobody talks about that part tho
Reply0
ThreeHornBlasts
· 12h ago
The risk coverage of returns may seem perfect, but in practice, it often falls flat.
---
Theoretically it makes sense, but in reality, factors like gas fees and slippage can mess things up.
---
Mining yields look high, but the risks can wipe out your gains in just a few rounds. Don't be fooled by APY.
---
Poor lending mechanisms can lead to liquidation directly, so caution is necessary.
---
This idea is good, but you have to watch out for platform跑路 and smart contract bugs.
---
I've thought about your idea too, but in the end, I find it too complicated. It's easier to just hold spot assets.
---
Running on the chain is feasible, but whether you can keep making money is another matter—it's a game of probability.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 12h ago
Liquidity mining returns, haha, it depends on which chain you're farming on.
---
Honestly, hedging is a good idea, but the lending mechanism just doesn't work.
---
This theory is great in theory, but in practice, the fees will grind you down.
---
Instead of pondering this, why not just create a few stablecoins and put them directly into lending protocols?
---
Yield coverage for risk? Uh, as long as the market doesn't crash again.
---
I've tried this approach too, and in the end, I lost money due to impermanent loss.
---
The key is which DeFi platform you choose; some can't generate excess returns at all.
---
Basically, it's the old trick of playing leverage to make quick money—a different shell.
---
It can run on-chain, but the costs and slippage can eat your profits into the negatives.
---
Instead of hedging USDT risk, why not just switch to other stablecoins?
View OriginalReply0
NFT_Therapy
· 12h ago
The theory is very solid, but executing it on the chain is full of pitfalls.
View OriginalReply0
EntryPositionAnalyst
· 12h ago
Market trends always give the answer in advance, it just depends on how quickly we react.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTrooper
· 12h ago
Sounds like gambling, but I like it
View OriginalReply0
UncommonNPC
· 12h ago
Can the returns from liquidity mining really offset the risks? I think you're overthinking it.
A few days ago, I was still pondering how to hedge against the downside risk of USDT, and then the market gave me an answer. I unexpectedly came across an interesting idea—using stablecoins to enhance returns and offset the impact of declines. Out of curiosity, I wanted to ask if it can be implemented using Web3 methods, such as through liquidity mining or lending mechanisms on certain DeFi platforms.
The key question is, does this logic really work on-chain? Can the yields cover the risks? Or is it just an ideal concept in theory?🤔