#美联储回购协议计划 $ZEC $FLOW $DOGE

🔥 The deflationary war heats up: which approach will ultimately succeed?

A wave of deflationary sentiment is sweeping the market, but ASTER and UNI, the two major players, have given very different answers.

🪙 ASTER's approach: Building an ecosystem from scratch
This guy doesn't just play the simple buyback and burn strategy. When real revenue comes in, they immediately launch a "money-burning plan," and team up with Japanese financial giant SBI to develop compliant stablecoins. The logic is clear— the more the ecosystem is used, the more deflationary it becomes; conversely, the more the tokens are used, the more valuable they become. By tying usage frequency directly to token value, the ecosystem itself becomes the value.

💎 UNI's strategy: Monetizing traffic
As the world's largest top-tier DEX, UNI plays it more straightforwardly. The protocol is already a giant; it simply switches to a fee-based model, burning all the revenue to governance tokens. In the past, governance tokens were just voting tools; now, they stand for real protocol revenue behind the scenes.

👉 The core difference is simple:
One is building a deflationary ecosystem from zero, the other is injecting the value of an existing massive protocol directly into the tokens.

Which side do you prefer? Long-term bet on ecosystem growth, or short-term gains from protocol revenue?