2025-12-29 09:26:24

There is a reliable rumor circulating in the industry — the core development team behind NetEase's "Land of Glory" is partnering with Korea's NEXUS to launch a blockchain SLG game next year.

You know "Land of Glory," right? This game has accumulated revenue of 18 billion. What does that indicate? It shows that the team knows how to create depth in SLG games, emphasizing strategy and long-term operation. This time, they plan to bring this concept onto the blockchain, integrating asset trading and Token economy systems. NEXUS is responsible for providing the underlying blockchain technology support.

Why is this worth paying attention to? SLG games are naturally suited for on-chain economies. Traditional SLG games already handle a large amount of economic data, and the demand for circulation of encrypted assets exists inherently. In theory, this type of game could break the curse in the blockchain gaming circle — "only trading tokens without real gameplay." Truly integrating traditional deep gameplay with on-chain economic systems might attract hundreds of thousands, even millions of traditional players.

Question for everyone: Are people still paying attention to the blockchain gaming track? What do you think — can the involvement of major traditional game companies truly revitalize this ecosystem?

TOKEN-12,11%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
8
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ChainDoctor

· 13h ago

The 18 billion figure for Rate of Land is indeed shocking. If they can really bring that deep gameplay onto the blockchain, this time might be different. Honestly, I haven't really played most blockchain games before; they were mostly Ponzi schemes. But this news has made me somewhat interested in paying attention. Deep SLG + token economy, the theoretical framework is solid, it all depends on whether NEXUS's underlying technology can hold up. If they can truly attract traditional players, blockchain games might have found their direction.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrier

· 16h ago

Veteran players of Rate Earth all understand, this team indeed has some skills; 18 billion is no joke. But I've seen too many pitfalls in blockchain games, hyped up but ultimately disappointing. Let's see if they can really pull it off; for now, it's just rumors, no point in speculating. Hmm, if they can truly avoid the trap of speculative trading, that would be interesting. But honestly, I don't quite believe it; the Token economy is too complex. Moving the operation system of Rate Earth to the blockchain? Sounds ideal, but in practice, all kinds of issues are waiting to happen. Let's wait until next year; there's no rush for this right now. Wow, NEXUS from Korea? The lineup looks quite sincere. But how big the pitfalls are, we'll only know once the product is out. No matter how much you talk about blockchain games, if there's no truly fun core, no matter how fancy the Token is, it's useless. I just want to see how they handle inflation—that's the core challenge for SLG blockchain games.

View OriginalReply0

CoinBasedThinking

· 16h ago

The team behind Rate the Land? This time it might really be different Wait, a team with 18 billion in revenue working on blockchain games, NEXUS technology support... this setup is impressive Honestly, blockchain games have been just pure money grabs before, can this be reliable now? A project at the level of 18 billion, even if it's bad, it won't be that bad Traditional games with deep Token economics sound much more reliable than those broken contract games Launching next year, keeping an eye on it, feels like a real opportunity for blockchain games If it succeeds, millions of players flooding into the blockchain game ecosystem wouldn't be a dream But as always, there are too many blockchain game graveyards, let's wait and see

View OriginalReply0

AirdropNinja

· 16h ago

The pay-to-win system of Land of Glory moved to the blockchain, but it still feels like a change in name only. --- 180 billion in revenue is indeed impressive, but the坑 of blockchain games is too deep. Aren't there many predecessors dying on the beach? --- Honestly, is NEXUS a reliable company? I haven't heard of it. --- It's about integration and breaking curses again. Every time it's said like this, but why haven't we seen a real hit yet? --- I've hyped it up so many times, but let's wait until the product comes out. Anyway, I have no hope anymore. --- If NetEase's team could really do well with blockchain games, they would have done it long ago. What does it mean that they are now going solo? --- Million-level players? Are you sure it's not just million-level FOMO retail investors, haha? --- SLG indeed has an economic foundation, but the key is still the Token model design; otherwise, it will be as cold as Axie.

View OriginalReply0

SandwichTrader

· 16h ago

I believe in the origin of the Rate Land. A valuation of 18 billion is no joke, but after so many years of filling the gap in chain games, is it really going to be different? --- Again fusion, again breaking curses, they all sound great, but I wonder if in the end it will still turn into another "play and earn" routine. --- I respect the 18 billion team, but I have to question the Korea partnership part. Will the review and policies... really go smoothly? --- Basically, it depends on the data. Whether it can truly attract traditional players will only be known after launch. Right now, all the hype is empty talk. --- Haha, the biggest problem with chain games isn't that no one is making them, but that no one wants to play them. Is this really different this time? --- SLG is naturally suitable? But the problem is, crypto players and traditional players are on completely different wavelengths. Integration isn't that simple. --- I just want to know when it will launch. Is there a real demo? Otherwise, it's all just talk. --- NetEase's industrialization capability on the chain does have imagination, but how many tears have been shed in this track already...

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-addcaaf7

· 16h ago

The Rate Earth team is working on blockchain games? Now this is interesting. Finally, someone wants to truly solve the stubborn problems of blockchain games. With 18 billion in revenue speaking, these folks really understand economic system design, unlike those projects that just cut the leeks. Let's wait and see. There are too many promising projects, but only a few will truly survive.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 16h ago

180 billion in revenue sounds impressive, but can the on-chain economic model hold up? It depends on the code audit results; just telling stories isn't enough.

View OriginalReply0

Rugpull幸存者

· 16h ago

The team from Luotu? Now this is interesting. A scale of 18 billion is no joke. --- Honestly, I'm already numb to blockchain games. Whether it can truly take off depends on how they proceed next. --- Deep gameplay plus Token economy... sounds good, but I hope it doesn't turn into another Battle Royale. --- The NetEase team is reliable, but I'm worried about it being ruined by capital. It depends on who the investors are. --- Wait, is NEXUS trustworthy? I don't quite understand this cooperation method. --- Millions of players entering? Dream on haha. First, get the no-slicing-leeks thing right. --- SLG is naturally suitable for blockchain games, but only if it really makes money; otherwise, it's just empty talk. --- Next year? Again, next year. Let's wait and see. --- If this time they can truly break the curse of "only trading coins without real gameplay," I’ll believe it. So far, no one in the blockchain game circle has done that. --- The Luotu IP indeed has a solid foundation, but the key is whether it can retain that deep strategic feel after going on-chain.

View OriginalReply0