Recently, I noticed an arbitrage mechanism in ZKC that is worth analyzing. The spot and quarterly contract prices have diverged by about 1.2%, while the funding rate has shifted from negative to positive and is at a relatively high level.
The data looks very attractive. The spot price is quoted at 0.13 USDT, and the quarterly contract at 0.13156 USDT, locking in a 1.2% profit from the price difference. Plus, the current 1-hour funding rate is 0.05% (interest calculated over 8 hours). If the rate remains stable, the daily return could reach 0.15%.
The standard arbitrage approach is as follows: buy spot, while shorting an equivalent contract. The price difference and funding income become your locked-in profit. Roughly calculating a 3-day holding period: the price difference contributes 1.2%, the funding rate adds about 0.45%, totaling 1.65% gross return. After deducting bilateral trading fees of 0.2%, the net profit is around 1.45%. Annualized, this is indeed attractive.
But there is a major issue—spot trading volume has collapsed. The 24-hour decline is -86.8%, and liquidity is severely lacking. What does this mean? It means that when you want to buy spot, you may have to pay a worse price, and when closing your position, you might face slippage. The hedging costs could silently eat into some of your profits.
Therefore, the current judgment is: wait and see. Although the annualized figures look good, the liquidity risk completely offsets the arbitrage opportunity. Unless the price difference can stabilize above 1.5%, or the spot trading volume recovers to around 100 million, it’s not worth acting. The risk-reward ratio doesn’t match at the moment.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
YieldWhisperer
· 10h ago
Liquidity collapse, no matter how high the annualized rate is, is just paper wealth; slippage can wipe out half of your life.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullProphet
· 10h ago
Still daring to leverage with such poor liquidity? The slippage will directly eat up your small gains.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeGazer
· 10h ago
Liquidity collapses, and even the best returns become paper tigers.
View OriginalReply0
LightningClicker
· 10h ago
Liquidity collapse, no matter how beautiful the annualized rate is, it's all just armchair strategy.
Recently, I noticed an arbitrage mechanism in ZKC that is worth analyzing. The spot and quarterly contract prices have diverged by about 1.2%, while the funding rate has shifted from negative to positive and is at a relatively high level.
The data looks very attractive. The spot price is quoted at 0.13 USDT, and the quarterly contract at 0.13156 USDT, locking in a 1.2% profit from the price difference. Plus, the current 1-hour funding rate is 0.05% (interest calculated over 8 hours). If the rate remains stable, the daily return could reach 0.15%.
The standard arbitrage approach is as follows: buy spot, while shorting an equivalent contract. The price difference and funding income become your locked-in profit. Roughly calculating a 3-day holding period: the price difference contributes 1.2%, the funding rate adds about 0.45%, totaling 1.65% gross return. After deducting bilateral trading fees of 0.2%, the net profit is around 1.45%. Annualized, this is indeed attractive.
But there is a major issue—spot trading volume has collapsed. The 24-hour decline is -86.8%, and liquidity is severely lacking. What does this mean? It means that when you want to buy spot, you may have to pay a worse price, and when closing your position, you might face slippage. The hedging costs could silently eat into some of your profits.
Therefore, the current judgment is: wait and see. Although the annualized figures look good, the liquidity risk completely offsets the arbitrage opportunity. Unless the price difference can stabilize above 1.5%, or the spot trading volume recovers to around 100 million, it’s not worth acting. The risk-reward ratio doesn’t match at the moment.