In projects using the GGG model, Shirley's tax allocation parameter is set at 10M on the Base chain. Is this amount necessary? Is it possible to adjust it to 1M? From a governance perspective, how would lowering this parameter affect the entire allocation mechanism?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractBugHunter
· 3h ago
10M changed to 1M? Sounds like they just want to save on Gas, but does that mean we have to go through governance voting again...
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlice
· 10h ago
10M is indeed a bit outrageous, trying 1M is also okay, anyway it's all in the testing phase.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 10h ago
10M changed to 1M? Cutting 90% directly. This definitely needs to be asked if it will ruin the entire distribution mechanism.
View OriginalReply0
WalletInspector
· 10h ago
10M down to 1M? Sounds like it's trying to cut costs by exploiting the system... but wouldn't that disrupt the entire incentive mechanism?
View OriginalReply0
CantAffordPancake
· 10h ago
10M changed to 1M? That feels a bit aggressive, cutting directly by 90%
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 10h ago
10M is indeed a bit outrageous, I think 1M is worth a try anyway, after all, on-chain data speaks for itself.
In projects using the GGG model, Shirley's tax allocation parameter is set at 10M on the Base chain. Is this amount necessary? Is it possible to adjust it to 1M? From a governance perspective, how would lowering this parameter affect the entire allocation mechanism?