The operational logic behind the $BLACKED project is worth paying attention to. In the early stages, the project team invested a large amount of chips into the LP pool, followed by multiple self-funded replenishments, gradually breaking through key market resistance levels. This approach reflects the project's precise control over market rhythm—shaping upward momentum through orderly capital injection. Currently, the project community building has not kept pace, and market participants still have doubts about the true intentions of the development team. In this situation, it becomes especially important to continuously observe the project's subsequent funding actions and ecosystem planning. From the perspective of chip distribution and on-chain behavior, a relatively clear trading strategy can be seen, but whether a healthy ecosystem can ultimately be formed depends on community development and market feedback.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTArchaeologist
· 7h ago
This is a typical pump-and-dump scheme where the whales hype themselves up. Why pretend to boost the market with their own money? The community hasn't even grown, and they're just talking about the ecosystem...
View OriginalReply0
zkProofGremlin
· 7h ago
This is a classic case of leverage on oneself. What sounds nice as "precise control" is actually just playing a chips game.
Community building can't keep up; no matter how much money is spent to dump the market, it won't save a project without trust.
Let's wait and see. If there's no real ecosystem implementation later on, the answer will be clear.
We've seen this kind of manipulation pattern many times in Web3. The key still depends on whether the team genuinely puts in effort.
View OriginalReply0
just_here_for_vibes
· 8h ago
Bro, this is a typical Ponzi scheme manipulation method, basically just pumping the market.
The project team is probably just fooling the community... I have serious doubts.
Having a clear manipulation strategy does not mean the project is reliable; there's a big gap.
For those without a community foundation, the risk of跑路 (跑路 means "running away" or "scamming") later is quite high.
I'll keep an eye on it, but I definitely don't dare to buy.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-c802f0e8
· 8h ago
This trading strategy is outdated, it's the same old script of "adding funds to pump the price." In the end, if the community can't keep up, they'll be the ones getting chopped.
The operational logic behind the $BLACKED project is worth paying attention to. In the early stages, the project team invested a large amount of chips into the LP pool, followed by multiple self-funded replenishments, gradually breaking through key market resistance levels. This approach reflects the project's precise control over market rhythm—shaping upward momentum through orderly capital injection. Currently, the project community building has not kept pace, and market participants still have doubts about the true intentions of the development team. In this situation, it becomes especially important to continuously observe the project's subsequent funding actions and ecosystem planning. From the perspective of chip distribution and on-chain behavior, a relatively clear trading strategy can be seen, but whether a healthy ecosystem can ultimately be formed depends on community development and market feedback.