The wave of collective bullish predictions at the beginning of 2025 is a bit awkward—currently, the market's expectations for where Bitcoin could go next year have become more realistic. However, based on the voices from various sources that have already been released, the majority still lean towards bullishness, just with more solid reasoning.
Heavyweight institutions like Tom Lee, Standard Chartered, Bernstein, JPMorgan, and Citigroup have recently provided price range forecasts for 2026, generally centered between $150,000 and $250,000. These numbers are not pulled out of thin air; they are supported by several clear logical chains.
First is the expansion expectation of institutional funds. Large institutions are still increasing their allocations, but their actions are more cautious yet more determined this time. Second is the continued inflow of funds into spot ETFs—a major factor—this wave that pushed prices higher last year is still ongoing this year. The last key variable is regulatory clarity. Improved policy expectations directly reduce the risk weight for institutions, which is crucial for large-scale allocation decisions.
Industry observers like Arthur Hayes and IOSG also view the situation within this framework, each focusing on different aspects but sharing a common overall direction. From the collective misjudgment at the start of the year to the current cautious optimism, the market is indeed learning how to view these predictions more rationally.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeeCryBaby
· 8h ago
150,000 to 250,000? Nice words, but it's just gambling with a different name. The inflow into ETFs is enough for what...
View OriginalReply0
RamenStacker
· 8h ago
Hmm... the figure of 150,000 to 250,000 still sounds a bit conservative. Are these institutions trying to play it safe again?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 8h ago
The 150,000-250,000 range is honestly a bit conservative. Do those big institutions really dare to bet?
View OriginalReply0
RektHunter
· 8h ago
150,000 to 250,000? These institutions are really good at leaving themselves a way out. Anyway, this range is big enough, haha.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseTrendSister
· 8h ago
Playing within the 150,000-250,000 range, institutions are really starting to take it seriously. But I just want to ask, how long can this logical chain last this time?
The wave of collective bullish predictions at the beginning of 2025 is a bit awkward—currently, the market's expectations for where Bitcoin could go next year have become more realistic. However, based on the voices from various sources that have already been released, the majority still lean towards bullishness, just with more solid reasoning.
Heavyweight institutions like Tom Lee, Standard Chartered, Bernstein, JPMorgan, and Citigroup have recently provided price range forecasts for 2026, generally centered between $150,000 and $250,000. These numbers are not pulled out of thin air; they are supported by several clear logical chains.
First is the expansion expectation of institutional funds. Large institutions are still increasing their allocations, but their actions are more cautious yet more determined this time. Second is the continued inflow of funds into spot ETFs—a major factor—this wave that pushed prices higher last year is still ongoing this year. The last key variable is regulatory clarity. Improved policy expectations directly reduce the risk weight for institutions, which is crucial for large-scale allocation decisions.
Industry observers like Arthur Hayes and IOSG also view the situation within this framework, each focusing on different aspects but sharing a common overall direction. From the collective misjudgment at the start of the year to the current cautious optimism, the market is indeed learning how to view these predictions more rationally.