SHIRLEY token hitting 176k market cap caught some eyes. What's interesting is the narrative building around it—looks like FINN and Nick Shirley are connected on social platforms, which adds some credibility to the project movement.
Here's where it gets notable: FINN went in with a $4000 buy, signaling actual skin in the game. Nick followed suit with his own position. This kind of aligned buying from recognizable figures in the space tends to draw community attention, especially when they're publicly visible about their moves.
Obviously, do your own research before considering any position. The token is still in early stages with relatively modest liquidity, so volatility is definitely on the table. Worth monitoring if you're tracking emerging projects in this cycle.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
HappyMinerUncle
· 7h ago
Ha FINN, this guy really has guts, directly投入4000... But I've seen this kind of big V collaboration buying pattern many times before.
Liquidity is so tight, yet he still dares to push. If it were me, I’d say it’s all about luck.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeBeggar
· 7h ago
Ha FINN spent 4,000 yuan to get in, looks like he's serious
The position is too small, liquidity is worrying
Did Nick also follow the trend and buy? This narrative seems a bit forced
Early projects are like this, it's a gamble
Let's wait and see if anyone leads the market
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 7h ago
Ha, it's the same old narrative... Watching FINN spend $4,000 is a bit interesting, but I'm just worried it's a premeditated scheme to cut our leeks.
---
Early-stage projects have such tight liquidity, how dare they follow the trend... I'll wait and see.
---
I've seen many plays where celebrities buy together, but the key is whether there will be actual application landing later.
---
Market cap of 176k? That's too small, slippage will definitely be gg, unless there's really a story...
---
When did Nick start playing meme coins? That's a bit surprising.
---
Self-developed is the way to go; no one's name can do the trick. I only look at the fundamentals.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatcher
· 7h ago
Caught this wave of SHIRLEY hype, a $4000 buy-in is quite interesting. Looks like this guy isn't just talking the talk.
View OriginalReply0
LayerHopper
· 7h ago
Putting in $4000 really takes guts; this pace is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
ResearchChadButBroke
· 7h ago
Wow, the big shots really poured in real money, this signal is a bit meaningful
FINN's $4,000 buy-in is no joke, Nick is also involved... this coordination doesn't seem like a coincidence
But liquidity is a bit uncertain, early projects are always like this, either making a fortune or going to zero, I think I'll just watch and wait
SHIRLEY token hitting 176k market cap caught some eyes. What's interesting is the narrative building around it—looks like FINN and Nick Shirley are connected on social platforms, which adds some credibility to the project movement.
Here's where it gets notable: FINN went in with a $4000 buy, signaling actual skin in the game. Nick followed suit with his own position. This kind of aligned buying from recognizable figures in the space tends to draw community attention, especially when they're publicly visible about their moves.
Obviously, do your own research before considering any position. The token is still in early stages with relatively modest liquidity, so volatility is definitely on the table. Worth monitoring if you're tracking emerging projects in this cycle.