2025-12-29 12:21:34

The new project Money Tree has recently launched, attracting attention. The project adopts a brand-new token distribution model, setting a 3% tax fee structure on buy and sell transactions, of which 1.5% is used for holder dividend rewards, and another 1.5% is used for buyback and token burn. This dual incentive mechanism aims to protect the interests of long-term holders while maintaining token value stability through burning. According to project information, only 3% of early chips are held by a few, which means that most tokens are relatively dispersed in liquidity, reducing the risk of a single large holder dumping. For participants, DYOR (Do Your Own Research) is still necessary—deep understanding of the project's actual application scenarios, team background, and long-term development roadmap is required. This kind of token design that combines dividend and burn mechanisms remains an innovative attempt in the current market and is worth watching for its future performance.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GasFeeCry

· 12h ago

3% tax fee with both dividends and burns? Sounds pretty good, but I'm worried it's just a scam --- Money Tree... The name sounds like a clear signal to cut leeks --- Dispersing chips sounds good, but the key is whether there will be actual applications later --- Is it really about DYOR and long-term holding, or is it just talk? --- The dual mechanism sounds nice, but I'm afraid the dividends are just a mirage --- I just want to know, is the buyback and burn real or just on-chain theatrics --- A 3% tax fee isn't high, but the question is, how does this project team make money? --- Dispersing chips indeed reduces risk, but is it a bit early to start bragging about this just a few days after launch? --- Honestly, I've seen too many "innovative mechanisms" end up in complete failure --- Has anyone done an in-depth review of their roadmap, or are they just thinking about dividends?

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 12h ago

It's another routine of dividends + burns, I've heard it too many times. How many actually manage to succeed? A 3% tax fee doesn't sound like much, but with frequent transactions, it adds up quickly, and the holding costs become high. Money Tree? The name sounds quite dreamy haha, but I'm just worried it might turn into a "money trap." Early on, there weren't many large holders with 3%, but who provided this data? DYOR is correct, but all the information comes from the project team itself. Let's see the Roadmap first; there are too many projects like this now. The dividend mechanism seems more of a gimmick than practical; can burns really sustain the price? That's a joke—who will rescue the price when it drops? Wait and see, anyway, those who got in early are all unlucky.

View OriginalReply0

airdrop_whisperer

· 12h ago

3% tax fee sounds good, but the key is whether the team is reliable or not. The name Money Tree sounds a bit suspicious, always feels like it's going to collapse. Dispersing chips is a good thing, but I've seen this mechanism several times before... The dual destruction mode is fresh, you can join and play around, but don't go all in. The real test is whether there are practical application scenarios later on.

View OriginalReply0

TokenUnlocker

· 12h ago

The dual mechanism sounds good, but the real test is whether the team can deliver. Honestly, a 3% fee is acceptable for holders, but the key is whether there are real use cases. Another burn model... I've heard this routine many times before, DYOR is really important. Early dispersed chips are a plus, but don't be fooled by this. It's better to check the white paper first. Money Tree? The name is quite catchy, but I'm just worried there won't be any fruit in the end. Buyback and burn double combo, feels a bit aggressive, be careful of bloodsucking. The dividend mechanism sounds great, but I don't know where the money is coming from; need to trace the source. There are too many projects like this. They all sound like the same routine, so let's wait and see. Dispersed chips indeed reduce risk, but I'm more concerned about the team background. Where is this information?

View OriginalReply0