Recently, many people have been debating how to play the prediction market. To be honest, if you're in the crypto space, you need to choose between two directions. One is the fully decentralized Web3 approach, and the other is the traditional financial route with the established players. Today, we'll explore both sides.
First, let's talk about the differences in architecture and positioning. One side includes platforms like Polymarket, built on the Polygon chain, using USDC for settlement, with a completely decentralized approach. The characteristic of this side is that the topics are diverse—ranging from political elections to trending internet celebrities. The other side is Kalshi, a compliant exchange regulated by the U.S. CFTC, settled in USD, following the traditional financial model. The user groups are entirely different: Polymarket attracts crypto veterans and DeFi enthusiasts, while Kalshi targets local U.S. users and institutional funds, with a strong emphasis on compliance.
As for retail investors, the main concern is how to make money. The difference in liquidity is significant. Currently, Polymarket leads in liquidity by a wide margin. What does this mean for retail traders? Lower slippage, meaning lower costs to enter and exit the market. This can save a lot of money during frequent trading.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ClassicDumpster
· 10h ago
Let me put it this way, Polymarket's liquidity crushing Kalshi is really no problem; the key is whether you can buy the dip.
Kalshi compliant? It sounds like it’s shackled; I just love the free and unrestricted feeling of Poly.
The slippage is so large, frequent trading can indeed save some money, but the premise is that you're not a loser haha.
Decentralized things ultimately belong to the crypto community; Kalshi is prepared for institutions.
To put it simply, it still depends on whether you know how to play; no matter how good Polymarket's liquidity is, a noob will still lose money.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 10h ago
If I had known that Polymarket's liquidity was this crazy, I wouldn't have stubbornly stuck with Kalshi. Now the slippage could wipe people out, and I'm kicking myself for it.
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 10h ago
Polymarket liquidity crushes, with low slippage—this is really understood by those who frequently cut.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviser
· 10h ago
Polymarket liquidity indeed outperforms, but what about the risks? How do we evaluate this?
View OriginalReply0
ruggedSoBadLMAO
· 10h ago
Low slippage is low, but the risk on Polymarket's side isn't small either. The sword of regulation is always hanging overhead.
Recently, many people have been debating how to play the prediction market. To be honest, if you're in the crypto space, you need to choose between two directions. One is the fully decentralized Web3 approach, and the other is the traditional financial route with the established players. Today, we'll explore both sides.
First, let's talk about the differences in architecture and positioning. One side includes platforms like Polymarket, built on the Polygon chain, using USDC for settlement, with a completely decentralized approach. The characteristic of this side is that the topics are diverse—ranging from political elections to trending internet celebrities. The other side is Kalshi, a compliant exchange regulated by the U.S. CFTC, settled in USD, following the traditional financial model. The user groups are entirely different: Polymarket attracts crypto veterans and DeFi enthusiasts, while Kalshi targets local U.S. users and institutional funds, with a strong emphasis on compliance.
As for retail investors, the main concern is how to make money. The difference in liquidity is significant. Currently, Polymarket leads in liquidity by a wide margin. What does this mean for retail traders? Lower slippage, meaning lower costs to enter and exit the market. This can save a lot of money during frequent trading.