2026-01-01 20:27:54

Thinking about launching a 100k to 10k trading challenge publicly. Wonder if it's worth the effort? The appeal of a massive drawdown would definitely catch attention, but there's the whole credibility factor to consider. Do you reckon pushing something like this would actually resonate with traders, or is it just adding noise?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

17 Likes

Reward
17
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CounterIndicator

· 8h ago

Bro, this trick has been played out long ago. Those who are truly capable don't need to show off their accounts...

View OriginalReply0

MysteriousZhang

· 12h ago

It sounds like just trying to ride the hype. Losing from 100k to 10k definitely grabs attention, but does showing losses really help gain followers?

View OriginalReply0

liquidation_watcher

· 01-01 20:57

Hey, really, I'm already tired of the attention-grabbing stuff like losing from 100k to 10k. It feels unoriginal.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 01-01 20:38

NGL, this kind of challenge is easy to backfire. Going all-in and losing so much actually causes followers to drop. Staying low-key and steady is more effective for gaining fans.

View OriginalReply0

DaoResearcher

· 01-01 20:32

According to the incentive mechanism model in the white paper, governance proposals such as "significant drawdown challenges" actually face a typical information asymmetry problem—based on data performance, within the 95% confidence interval, such marketing gimmicks may actually reduce long-term credibility. It is worth noting that the limitations of Token Weighted Voting are once again evident here; specifically: your credibility is your Token, and a single failure directly resets it to zero.

View OriginalReply0