The overseas community has recently been buzzing. A project called APEMARS has been frequently compared to Solana, claiming to become the next high-performance public chain. The logic behind this is quite clear: Solana's ICO price was only $0.25 in the early days, and now it has soared above $200. Investors who missed out are now likely to be tempted by similar projects.
What is APEMARS mainly promoting? A combination of LayerZero cross-chain solutions and low Gas fees. The project team even claims that their cross-chain transaction speed is 100 times faster than Ethereum. It sounds very attractive, but a question needs to be asked—these data all come from the project team’s own statements, and the actual on-chain transaction volume has not yet surpassed one million transactions. There is still a gap between reality and hype.
From market reactions, it is indeed easy to see short-term hype, as FOMO sentiment can be contagious. But in the long run, the cross-chain sector is already a red ocean, with established players like Polygon and Axelar having long since secured their positions. Whether it can truly break through depends on whether the technology can be implemented effectively and whether the ecosystem can thrive. Relying solely on stories is not sustainable in the long term.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AllInAlice
· 9h ago
It's the same old trick again, hyping it up with grandiose claims, but the trading volume hasn't even broken a million.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-74b10196
· 13h ago
Is this the same trick again? Do you believe the data you boast about yourself?
View OriginalReply0
rekt_but_resilient
· 13h ago
Another one claiming to be the "Next Solana," hilarious. How long is this script going to be played out?
They dare to boast 100x returns based on their own data. I've seen this trick too many times. Let's wait until trading volume actually increases before talking.
Still trying to break out of the red ocean? Polygon is still struggling, so why should you?
FOMO is more aggressive than anything else, but I still don't touch this stuff.
If storytelling could make money, I would have been financially free a long time ago.
View OriginalReply0
ForeverBuyingDips
· 13h ago
Another Solana dream, wake up everyone
No matter how good the story is, the on-chain data has to speak
Hundreds of thousands of transactions haven't broken through, dare to boast 100x speed? Laughable
The cross-chain pit has been trodden to death, Polygon is still there
Wait until the ecosystem really takes off, for now it's all FOMO bagholders
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSurvivor
· 13h ago
It's another Solana copy-paste version, I just smile and say nothing.
The overseas community has recently been buzzing. A project called APEMARS has been frequently compared to Solana, claiming to become the next high-performance public chain. The logic behind this is quite clear: Solana's ICO price was only $0.25 in the early days, and now it has soared above $200. Investors who missed out are now likely to be tempted by similar projects.
What is APEMARS mainly promoting? A combination of LayerZero cross-chain solutions and low Gas fees. The project team even claims that their cross-chain transaction speed is 100 times faster than Ethereum. It sounds very attractive, but a question needs to be asked—these data all come from the project team’s own statements, and the actual on-chain transaction volume has not yet surpassed one million transactions. There is still a gap between reality and hype.
From market reactions, it is indeed easy to see short-term hype, as FOMO sentiment can be contagious. But in the long run, the cross-chain sector is already a red ocean, with established players like Polygon and Axelar having long since secured their positions. Whether it can truly break through depends on whether the technology can be implemented effectively and whether the ecosystem can thrive. Relying solely on stories is not sustainable in the long term.