The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) harshly poured cold water on stablecoins in its latest Financial Stability Report. Their core message is straightforward: countries should prioritize developing CBDCs because private stablecoins not only threaten financial stability but also undermine the singularity of the monetary system, laying the groundwork for systemic risks.
Does this sound a bit absolute? But looking at the three issues they listed makes it clear.
First is the collapse of monetary singularity. Private stablecoins are essentially liabilities of private institutions, fully dependent on reserve quality, governance standards, and market confidence. When financial pressure mounts, users may rush to redeem en masse, causing liquidity to dry up immediately. This contradicts the fundamental principle that "money is ultimately settled by the central bank," fragmenting the entire monetary system.
Second is the amplification of financial instability. When markets tighten, stablecoin holders may withdraw funds on a large scale, or reserve assets may lose liquidity; the risk is not absorbed but magnified. Private institutions lack the "lender of last resort" capability that central banks have, so once systemic risk hits, they are unable to withstand it.
The third issue is even more sensitive: erosion of sovereignty. Stablecoins pegged to the US dollar can easily lead to "dollarization," directly impacting monetary sovereignty, interfering with the central bank's policy transmission, and potentially bypassing capital controls, thereby disrupting the financial order of emerging markets.
The Deputy Governor of RBI even said more harshly: India's UPI payment system is already highly efficient; stablecoins have no practical value and instead create uncontrollable risks.
So what about CBDCs? RBI believes this is the foundation of the future. Because CBDCs are direct liabilities of the central bank, backed by national credit and absolute legal tender, they can firmly maintain monetary singularity, serving as the last line of defense for the financial system.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizer
· 12h ago
The Reserve Bank of India’s statements sound very official, but honestly, they are just paving the way for CBDC. In the end, we all have to listen to the central bank.
View OriginalReply0
OfflineValidator
· 12h ago
Stablecoins are once again being scrutinized by the government... But to be fair, the Reserve Bank of India’s logic does hold water—CBDC is the legitimate one, and private stablecoins are essentially black boxes.
View OriginalReply0
PretendingSerious
· 12h ago
Ha, this time the Reserve Bank of India really isn't giving stablecoins any face; it's a direct kill against private projects.
CBDC is truly inevitable; only with central bank control can they sleep peacefully.
The system crashes the moment stablecoins are concentrated in withdrawals; this risk really can't be sustained.
This logic is a bit harsh; India's concern that dollarization threatens sovereignty is very forward-thinking.
After all this time, it's finally clear that the government is directly stating that private stablecoins are just dividing the minting rights.
If UPI is sufficient, why bother with other things? There's really no need.
The central bank as the final lender is indeed the ballast; private institutions can never fill this gap.
It feels like this is setting a good example for global central banks.
They've thought this through so thoroughly; emerging markets should learn from it.
When it comes to sovereignty, the Reserve Bank of India explains it more clearly than anything else.
View OriginalReply0
SingleForYears
· 12h ago
Stablecoins are about to be criticized again. This time, the Reserve Bank of India really doesn't like them. It seems that central banks worldwide are speaking with a unified voice, prioritizing the development of CBDCs.
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) harshly poured cold water on stablecoins in its latest Financial Stability Report. Their core message is straightforward: countries should prioritize developing CBDCs because private stablecoins not only threaten financial stability but also undermine the singularity of the monetary system, laying the groundwork for systemic risks.
Does this sound a bit absolute? But looking at the three issues they listed makes it clear.
First is the collapse of monetary singularity. Private stablecoins are essentially liabilities of private institutions, fully dependent on reserve quality, governance standards, and market confidence. When financial pressure mounts, users may rush to redeem en masse, causing liquidity to dry up immediately. This contradicts the fundamental principle that "money is ultimately settled by the central bank," fragmenting the entire monetary system.
Second is the amplification of financial instability. When markets tighten, stablecoin holders may withdraw funds on a large scale, or reserve assets may lose liquidity; the risk is not absorbed but magnified. Private institutions lack the "lender of last resort" capability that central banks have, so once systemic risk hits, they are unable to withstand it.
The third issue is even more sensitive: erosion of sovereignty. Stablecoins pegged to the US dollar can easily lead to "dollarization," directly impacting monetary sovereignty, interfering with the central bank's policy transmission, and potentially bypassing capital controls, thereby disrupting the financial order of emerging markets.
The Deputy Governor of RBI even said more harshly: India's UPI payment system is already highly efficient; stablecoins have no practical value and instead create uncontrollable risks.
So what about CBDCs? RBI believes this is the foundation of the future. Because CBDCs are direct liabilities of the central bank, backed by national credit and absolute legal tender, they can firmly maintain monetary singularity, serving as the last line of defense for the financial system.