2026-01-02 03:25:14

It's wild how some token bundling mechanisms can backfire so spectacularly—investors end up taking losses when they unwind positions, and the project's final marketcap bottoms out below where it launched. The architectural flaw is right there in the design.

Who's actually building these systems? And more importantly, why are these patterns still recurring in the space? It feels like we should've solved this by now.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

16 Likes

Reward
16
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

BlockchainBouncer

· 1h ago

Damn, it's the same old trick again. Luckily, I got away quickly.

View OriginalReply0

ProposalManiac

· 16h ago

In simple terms, the core issue is that the incentive mechanism design was not thoroughly thought out. Looking at those failed token models in history, the problems are all the same: they dared to go live without game-theoretic equilibrium. How optimistic does that make you?

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker