Imagine you could deploy an AI agent to maximize your onchain trading returns across any asset or market—literally any position, any strategy. Here's the real question though: if the risk exposure was perfectly balanced across all assets, would you still care about *what* it was actually trading? About the ethics of those trades?
It cuts to something deeper in how we think about algorithmic trading. Pure profit optimization versus responsible participation in the market. When you remove risk as the constraint, does the moral dimension suddenly matter more? Or does it just expose who was never really concerned about it in the first place?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TradingNightmare
· 6h ago
Honestly, is ethical balance the cause of risk? That's funny. As long as it's profitable, no one cares about this stuff.
View OriginalReply0
MEVVictimAlliance
· 11h ago
Laughing out loud, moral constraints are a joke to those impatient traders. Remove the risk restrictions, and their true nature immediately shows.
View OriginalReply0
StealthMoon
· 11h ago
To be honest, this question is quite tricky... When the risk is balanced, people start to worry about ethics. Why not just engage in responsible trading from the beginning?🤔
View OriginalReply0
ShitcoinConnoisseur
· 11h ago
NGL, this question is quite pointed... If the risks are smoothed out, ethics will naturally come to the surface.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-2fce706c
· 11h ago
Haha, that's a clever question. To put it simply, it's all about making money— as long as your account doesn't get banned, who cares about morality? It's been said before that this circle is a jungle where the strong prey on the weak.
View OriginalReply0
zkProofInThePudding
· 11h ago
To be honest, this question is a bit vague... People who truly care about morality would have stopped playing this game long ago. Those still struggling with this are basically just looking for an excuse.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 11h ago
Honestly, if risk hedging perfects ethical issues, are they still a problem? The logic is a bit convoluted.
Imagine you could deploy an AI agent to maximize your onchain trading returns across any asset or market—literally any position, any strategy. Here's the real question though: if the risk exposure was perfectly balanced across all assets, would you still care about *what* it was actually trading? About the ethics of those trades?
It cuts to something deeper in how we think about algorithmic trading. Pure profit optimization versus responsible participation in the market. When you remove risk as the constraint, does the moral dimension suddenly matter more? Or does it just expose who was never really concerned about it in the first place?