The data logic of the annual statement is really brilliant.
In mid-December, I took a screenshot of the ranking data in the wealth management section—ranked 14th for the month, and just in the past 7 days, the wealth management收益 has reached 16,000 USDT. When I checked the annual statement, the system told me that the total wealth management收益 for the year could buy 195 cups of coffee. What kind of coffee is this at? Gold drip coffee?
Even more outrageous is that many friends around me have complained about the same issue. People with trading activity above 99% and收益 also above 99% are everywhere. What’s going on—have we really allocated the 1% quota to 99% of users?
Maybe the annual summary is just for fun, deliberately making it a bit "ridiculous." But if that's the case, we might as well treat it as an entertainment ranking. The real收益 data still depends on trading records and assets in the wallet. Instead of fussing over these flashy statistics, it’s better to seriously look at your own wealth management and trading costs, fees, and other tangible things.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DarkPoolWatcher
· 6h ago
Haha, I’m really impressed by this data logic. 195 cups of coffee? What can you buy with that?
99% of people are over 99%, this is just ridiculous. The platform really knows how to play.
Instead of looking at these fancy things, it’s better to figure out your own fees clearly.
Really, the annual statement is just for fun. How much is actually in your wallet is what counts.
View OriginalReply0
HodlTheDoor
· 6h ago
Haha, this data really went off the rails. 99% are the top 1%, which is a bit hopeless.
195 cups of coffee, that's hilarious. How is it calculated?
Don't believe this nonsense. Looking at the wallet is the real deal.
View OriginalReply0
DAOTruant
· 6h ago
Haha really, everyone is 99%, so this statistic is a joke
I can't hold back the number 195 cups of coffee, the platform's calculations are too magical
Rankings are all fake, it's better to look at the coins in the wallet
This round of system operations is just to create happiness, don't take it too seriously
Annual billing data is indeed outrageous, but the transaction fees are the real way to cut leeks
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseLandlord
· 6h ago
Haha, I’m laughing to death. I’m also like this, ranking in the top few but the system says I can buy two coffees.
195 cups of coffee is an outrageous number, clearly they’re playing us.
99% are traders with over 99% success rate, this logic is amazing. Why not say everyone is top-tier?
Instead of looking at these tricks, it’s better to really focus on transaction fees and real money.
The annual statement is just for fun, don’t take it seriously.
The real data is in the transaction records, that’s the real deal.
My ranking is also ridiculously high, but I just believe in my wallet.
This routine, tsk tsk, every year they come up with new tricks to fool us.
View OriginalReply0
TrustMeBro
· 6h ago
This data magic is really amazing, 195 cups of coffee? I really want to know how they calculated it haha
99% of people are over 99%, that logic is incredible, all top influencers, right?
Let's just take it as entertainment, but still, it depends on whether there's real gold and silver in the wallet
The data logic of the annual statement is really brilliant.
In mid-December, I took a screenshot of the ranking data in the wealth management section—ranked 14th for the month, and just in the past 7 days, the wealth management收益 has reached 16,000 USDT. When I checked the annual statement, the system told me that the total wealth management收益 for the year could buy 195 cups of coffee. What kind of coffee is this at? Gold drip coffee?
Even more outrageous is that many friends around me have complained about the same issue. People with trading activity above 99% and收益 also above 99% are everywhere. What’s going on—have we really allocated the 1% quota to 99% of users?
Maybe the annual summary is just for fun, deliberately making it a bit "ridiculous." But if that's the case, we might as well treat it as an entertainment ranking. The real收益 data still depends on trading records and assets in the wallet. Instead of fussing over these flashy statistics, it’s better to seriously look at your own wealth management and trading costs, fees, and other tangible things.