Someone shared an interesting strategy: use two accounts to each invest 500,000, hedging at the same price with one long and one short. The losing side holds on without setting a stop-loss, while the profitable account sets a take profit at 490,000—this seemingly simple operation can boost the account into the top three of a major exchange's popularity rankings with just a 10,000 yuan investment. Once the ranking is achieved, the path forward becomes clearer. Some start offering copy trading services to harvest those following the trend; others steadily earn commissions and enjoy long-term passive income; if all else fails, they can package their own trading courses for monetization. At first glance, this approach seems innovative, but the underlying logic actually reflects some interesting phenomena in the trading ecosystem—how ranking mechanisms, traffic competition, and monetization chains operate. Regardless, this idea of leveraging small costs to influence big rankings is worth traders' consideration.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PaperHandSister
· 01-05 18:55
Wow, this trick is really awesome. Can 10,000 yuan get you into the top three on the leaderboard? Oh my god, this is teaching us how to harvest the leeks, haha.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 01-04 06:22
Wow, this tactic is really awesome. Just spending 10,000 can get you into the top three on the leaderboard? I need to think this logic through.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMiner
· 01-04 03:54
Damn, this move—spending 10,000 yuan to boost the ranking—is just a harvesting pipeline for getting rid of the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 01-03 05:51
Playing the ranking game is just so predictable; no wonder some people can make millions in a month. To be honest, it's just using retail investors' money to gamble.
View OriginalReply0
MetaReckt
· 01-03 05:49
This trick is obvious at a glance, it's nothing more than spending 10,000 to buy hype; the real profit comes from later harvesting the gains.
View OriginalReply0
Degentleman
· 01-03 05:49
Wow, this move is incredible. 10,000 yuan ranks in the top three, and the rest is harvesting profits from the little guys, making a fortune.
View OriginalReply0
TokenToaster
· 01-03 05:42
Haha, this trick is amazing. Just 10,000 yuan can get you into the top three on the leaderboard? I need to think it over.
View OriginalReply0
EyeOfTheTokenStorm
· 01-03 05:27
Wait, isn't this operation just taking retail investors as leeks? Appearing to invest 10,000 in order to climb the rankings, but who bears the subsequent monetization costs?
Someone shared an interesting strategy: use two accounts to each invest 500,000, hedging at the same price with one long and one short. The losing side holds on without setting a stop-loss, while the profitable account sets a take profit at 490,000—this seemingly simple operation can boost the account into the top three of a major exchange's popularity rankings with just a 10,000 yuan investment. Once the ranking is achieved, the path forward becomes clearer. Some start offering copy trading services to harvest those following the trend; others steadily earn commissions and enjoy long-term passive income; if all else fails, they can package their own trading courses for monetization. At first glance, this approach seems innovative, but the underlying logic actually reflects some interesting phenomena in the trading ecosystem—how ranking mechanisms, traffic competition, and monetization chains operate. Regardless, this idea of leveraging small costs to influence big rankings is worth traders' consideration.