Crypto meets robotics—the first hybrid projects are hitting the market now, and honestly? The thesis feels shaky.
Here's the real tension: why does robotics even need blockchain in the first place? Where's the actual decentralization edge? When you dig into these teams' pitches, the reasoning often boils down to generic tokenomics talk and vague promises about distributed governance. Not exactly compelling.
That said, I'm watching closely. Maybe the next generation of projects will crack the code on this—finding genuine use cases beyond the buzzwords. For now though, most of these crypto-robotics plays seem to be grafting blockchain onto robotics just because it's trendy, not because it solves real problems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidityNinja
· 01-06 02:36
ngl this is just a disguised IQ tax under the guise of technology, with no real practical use cases
View OriginalReply0
BearWhisperGod
· 01-05 01:08
ngl This is just a prelude to a rug pull disguised as technology. Do robots really need coins? Wake up, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
FundingMartyr
· 01-03 12:49
Basically, it's just a hard push for fundraising. The robotics + crypto combo is too easy to scam people.
View OriginalReply0
SolidityJester
· 01-03 12:49
ngl Blockchain bot projects are just rough patches, they really have no practical use.
This wave of projects is just riding the trend for popularity; there are very few that actually solve problems.
It's all about tokenomics and distributed governance, sounds fancy but it's really just cutting leeks.
Let's wait and see, maybe there are some reliable projects, but right now these are all trash.
Why insist on using blockchain? I just can't understand this.
View OriginalReply0
NullWhisperer
· 01-03 12:48
honestly the "distributed governance" pitch for robot swarms is just lipstick on a pig—these teams haven't thought through the actual coordination problems yet
Reply0
mev_me_maybe
· 01-03 12:43
ngl is just a shell, copying the hype tactics from the crypto world onto the robot. You can't see the real demand behind it.
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatcher
· 01-03 12:35
NGL, this is a typical case of fundraising for the sake of fundraising. What is the real value of blockchain for robots?
View OriginalReply0
CryptoMom
· 01-03 12:23
Is this the same old trick again, just shell companies for fundraising?
---
Robotics doesn't lack on-chain governance at all; it's just about finding concepts to back oneself.
---
Wait, does anyone really believe that distributed governance can make robots run faster?
---
It's ridiculous, forcing everything onto the blockchain, thinking tokens can solve engineering problems.
---
I'm optimistic and looking forward to which project can deliver some real results, not just fundraising shows.
---
I generally pass on these kinds of projects; the more elaborate the tokenomics, the more bugs there are.
---
Feels like another scheme to harvest new retail investors; be smarter.
Crypto meets robotics—the first hybrid projects are hitting the market now, and honestly? The thesis feels shaky.
Here's the real tension: why does robotics even need blockchain in the first place? Where's the actual decentralization edge? When you dig into these teams' pitches, the reasoning often boils down to generic tokenomics talk and vague promises about distributed governance. Not exactly compelling.
That said, I'm watching closely. Maybe the next generation of projects will crack the code on this—finding genuine use cases beyond the buzzwords. For now though, most of these crypto-robotics plays seem to be grafting blockchain onto robotics just because it's trendy, not because it solves real problems.