A shocking on-chain investigation report was released at the end of the year, exposing a reserve crisis at a major exchange—out of the $1.78 billion stored by users, up to 88% has been diverted into high-risk activities such as lending and protocol filling. This is not just a simple risk management issue; it’s a case of funds being used as a "cash machine."
The data is alarming. Of the USDT reserves, $1.44 billion (81%) has been lent to lending platforms, $96 million flows into proprietary ecosystem protocols, and $18 million into derivatives products—meaning the actually available reserves are only $234 million, accounting for 12.6%. This implies that the USD assets in your account are actually engaged in high-risk investments.
The situation with ETH is even worse. Reserves have dropped from 392,000 ETH in May to 118,000 ETH, a 70% direct evaporation. Of the remaining amount, only 8% of the native ETH can be withdrawn at any time; the rest has been staked or lent out—account balances look good, but attempting to withdraw will be a shock.
What’s most suffocating is the subsequent response. Hackers have made three successful attacks within half a year, each time smoothly transferring out funds. During the latest withdrawal wave, $256 million was redeemed by users within 15 days, and the platform started to freeze withdrawals. When opening the withdrawal interface, many users’ requests show "Processing" for hours—once trust is broken, liquidity issues at exchanges are no longer just technical problems.
This incident has taught everyone a lesson: looking at the exchange’s reputation alone is useless. True security depends on whether the reserves in cold wallets are really there.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ApeWithAPlan
· 01-06 12:17
Damn it, it's the same old trick... Still dare to pretend that the cold wallet is really there? It cracks me up.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 01-03 23:37
Oh my god, is this the exchange you're still using? I already withdrew my coins a long time ago. I'm really so scared.
View OriginalReply0
TokenRationEater
· 01-03 12:50
Whoa, 88% has been moved out? This is not an exchange at all; it's probably a high-interest lending scheme disguised as an exchange.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Whisperer
· 01-03 12:50
Damn, 88% misappropriated? What's the difference from a direct scam, it's just a matter of time.
View OriginalReply0
LightningWallet
· 01-03 12:46
Wow, 88% misappropriation? Isn't that just insiders stealing from their own people, and calling it risk management?
Still have to queue to withdraw? Real money just evaporates like that, no wonder hackers managed to strike three times.
Having a big reputation doesn't mean much; if there's no funds in the cold wallet, it's just an empty shell.
View OriginalReply0
LightningSentry
· 01-03 12:43
Damn, 88% misappropriated? What is this if not gambling? Using user assets as a cash machine.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingersFOMO
· 01-03 12:39
Damn, 88% misappropriation? This is a blatant Ponzi scheme. The money in the account isn't really money; it's just pie in the sky.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 01-03 12:38
88% misappropriation? This is not a management issue, it's outright deception.
What’s the use of having pretty account numbers? When it comes to withdrawal, it’s a shock. I told you, even big-name exchanges are unreliable.
There’s no real gold or silver in the cold wallets, they’re just shells. My assets are safest in my own cold wallet.
Withdrawal freeze is unbelievable. Hackers can transfer out smoothly, but ordinary users get stuck? Laughable.
From 392,000 coins down to 118,000 coins, a 70% wipeout. If I were a user, I’d have already run.
Basically, they’re gambling with users’ money. If they lose, it’s game over. Who would dare to keep their funds there?
12.6% available reserve, the rest are just numbers on paper. To hell with it.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 01-03 12:38
Damn, 88% was misappropriated. Isn't this just Ponzi scheme tactics? Still dare to call it a leading exchange.
Really get stunned when trying to withdraw; this sentence is so true.
I just experienced a 12-hour withdrawal delay. Seeing this report now, I'm so nervous I wet my pants.
Cold wallets with real reserves are the way to go; everything else is nonsense.
Another "I'll help you manage your finances" story. Gradually starting to understand why self-custody is necessary.
This time, I truly see through it. Big platforms are just so-so.
A shocking on-chain investigation report was released at the end of the year, exposing a reserve crisis at a major exchange—out of the $1.78 billion stored by users, up to 88% has been diverted into high-risk activities such as lending and protocol filling. This is not just a simple risk management issue; it’s a case of funds being used as a "cash machine."
The data is alarming. Of the USDT reserves, $1.44 billion (81%) has been lent to lending platforms, $96 million flows into proprietary ecosystem protocols, and $18 million into derivatives products—meaning the actually available reserves are only $234 million, accounting for 12.6%. This implies that the USD assets in your account are actually engaged in high-risk investments.
The situation with ETH is even worse. Reserves have dropped from 392,000 ETH in May to 118,000 ETH, a 70% direct evaporation. Of the remaining amount, only 8% of the native ETH can be withdrawn at any time; the rest has been staked or lent out—account balances look good, but attempting to withdraw will be a shock.
What’s most suffocating is the subsequent response. Hackers have made three successful attacks within half a year, each time smoothly transferring out funds. During the latest withdrawal wave, $256 million was redeemed by users within 15 days, and the platform started to freeze withdrawals. When opening the withdrawal interface, many users’ requests show "Processing" for hours—once trust is broken, liquidity issues at exchanges are no longer just technical problems.
This incident has taught everyone a lesson: looking at the exchange’s reputation alone is useless. True security depends on whether the reserves in cold wallets are really there.