In cryptocurrency investing, I have always been looking for assets that can be held long-term and continuously generate returns. After years of observation, BNB, SOL, and AAVE are the three options I favor, with UNI serving as a supplementary allocation.
First, let's talk about BNB. The logic behind this coin is very clear—after purchasing, you stake it on the platform, and regularly receive airdrops and dividends. The more you hold, the more valuable the airdrops tend to be. When the market is hot, it's not unusual to receive three or four payouts in a month.
BNB itself has a solid fundamental foundation, and like BTC and ETH, it is a top-tier mainstream coin. With these types of coins, there's little need to worry about their prospects; just hold steady. Honestly, it's only a matter of time before BNB reaches five digits per coin. That’s why I call BNB the "King of Retirement"—the compound interest cycle formed by interest, dividends, and airdrops is truly impressive.
Next, let's discuss AAVE. This project has long had a safety pool mechanism, allowing users to lend tokens to the platform to earn interest, similar in mode to SOL.
The key turning point was when AAVE's founders decided to transfer full ownership of the protocol to the community. Many people didn't understand this move at the time, but in fact, it was a positive signal. Price fluctuations during the transition of power are normal; once this phase is over, holders can really embrace new opportunities.
I’ve roughly calculated the token holding weight. If you own between 100 and 300 tokens, you can have a say in community governance and participate in important votes. Holding over 1,000 tokens allows involvement in major decisions. If you own more than 10,000, any significant protocol adjustments will require community consultation with large holders like you. In other words, holding tokens not only yields profits but also grants governance rights. This model is especially friendly to long-term holders.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
bridgeOops
· 01-06 11:54
Hmm... I understood the logic of BNB a long time ago. The question is, if I buy now, can I still chase it? Feels like it's a bit late already.
The set of token holding weights sounds pretty good, but if AAVE really wants to decentralize power, it depends on whether the community can really pull it off. Historically, such changes usually end in chaos.
Just want to ask, is the staking yield on SOL stable? Compared to BNB's airdrop cycle, it feels a bit worse.
Is UNI's inclusion because its liquidity mining still has potential, or is there another reason?
Honestly, the concept of "retirement coins" sounds comfortable, but can you really sleep peacefully... with the market so volatile?
View OriginalReply0
faded_wojak.eth
· 01-06 11:45
I agree with the BNB pension plan, but I really dare to say five digits... The 10,000 AAVE threshold discouraged me; how many people can gather that amount?
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWallet
· 01-05 20:29
Stop with this "retirement" rhetoric. Basically, it's just big players siphoning money from the market. How much can BNB airdrops really amount to? When we look at on-chain data, the ones truly profiting are those whales holding over 10,000 tokens. What can retail investors get? Furthermore, that governance scheme of AAVE—does holding 100-300 tokens give you a say? That's laughable. When it comes to voting, it's still the 10,000+ whales who make the decisions. Isn't this just power concentration disguised as community governance?
View OriginalReply0
MEVEye
· 01-03 12:56
I'm tired of the term "BNB staking," but indeed, after a few months of not checking the account interest, there's always a bunch more... I need to think more about the decentralization logic of AAVE; it sounds a bit too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinArbitrageur
· 01-03 12:56
actually wait, you're conflating staking rewards with actual yield generation here. the basis points on bnb's monthly distribution have been compressing for like 18 months straight. i ran the numbers (backtesting against historical apy data, n=2400 datapoints) and the risk-adjusted returns are nowhere near what they were in 2021.
Reply0
DeFiGrayling
· 01-03 12:55
I'm also considering this BNB retirement plan, just worried that the entry point is too high now... The governance rights logic of AAVE is indeed pretty good, but it really requires having that many U, right?
View OriginalReply0
CoinBasedThinking
· 01-03 12:55
BNB养老 is indeed solid; it just requires some principal to be invested, otherwise small retail investors get very little.
The governance rights of AAVE seem a bit overhyped. How many people can actually participate in decision-making? Most are just lying back and earning interest.
View OriginalReply0
ContractExplorer
· 01-03 12:51
BNB really needs no comment; the feeling of staking and earning passively is just awesome. But five figures? That's a bit bold to say haha.
I didn't quite grasp the decentralization move of Aave at first, but now I see it's indeed a clever strategy. Trading governance rights for rewards—this logic really works.
View OriginalReply0
NFTRegretful
· 01-03 12:34
BNB this logic is indeed brilliant. I also benefit from the staking airdrop system, but you have to be patient... I was a bit confused about the step of decentralizing AAVE, but hearing you say it, it seems to be a long-term positive? The question is, when will we see the results?
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 01-03 12:30
Sounds good, but I have to be the bearer of bad news — this "retirement compound interest" logic is easily rendered useless in a bear market. The airdrop gains, when the next cycle downturn hits, may not even offset the principal shrinkage.
In cryptocurrency investing, I have always been looking for assets that can be held long-term and continuously generate returns. After years of observation, BNB, SOL, and AAVE are the three options I favor, with UNI serving as a supplementary allocation.
First, let's talk about BNB. The logic behind this coin is very clear—after purchasing, you stake it on the platform, and regularly receive airdrops and dividends. The more you hold, the more valuable the airdrops tend to be. When the market is hot, it's not unusual to receive three or four payouts in a month.
BNB itself has a solid fundamental foundation, and like BTC and ETH, it is a top-tier mainstream coin. With these types of coins, there's little need to worry about their prospects; just hold steady. Honestly, it's only a matter of time before BNB reaches five digits per coin. That’s why I call BNB the "King of Retirement"—the compound interest cycle formed by interest, dividends, and airdrops is truly impressive.
Next, let's discuss AAVE. This project has long had a safety pool mechanism, allowing users to lend tokens to the platform to earn interest, similar in mode to SOL.
The key turning point was when AAVE's founders decided to transfer full ownership of the protocol to the community. Many people didn't understand this move at the time, but in fact, it was a positive signal. Price fluctuations during the transition of power are normal; once this phase is over, holders can really embrace new opportunities.
I’ve roughly calculated the token holding weight. If you own between 100 and 300 tokens, you can have a say in community governance and participate in important votes. Holding over 1,000 tokens allows involvement in major decisions. If you own more than 10,000, any significant protocol adjustments will require community consultation with large holders like you. In other words, holding tokens not only yields profits but also grants governance rights. This model is especially friendly to long-term holders.