2026-01-03 13:22:12

The deployment strategies of the same cryptocurrency on BSC and Solana are quite worth pondering. Can multiple chains on BSC be considered effective diversification? The liquidity landscape on the Solana ecosystem is another matter. From the perspective of expected returns, BSC is positioned by the market as an Alpha opportunity, but what about Solana? The competitive landscape between the two mainstream public chains determines capital flow and project team choices. This reflects the differences in risk appetite among investors on different chains and the maturity of the markets.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LoneValidator

· 01-06 11:36

It's still more satisfying to farm on BSC; Solana's liquidity is way too low, bro.

View OriginalReply0

LayoffMiner

· 01-05 23:00

That bunch of BSC projects are basically just schemes to harvest retail investors, Solana is the real Alpha.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinArbitrageur

· 01-03 13:42

actually if you run the numbers on bsc vs sol liquidity fragmentation, the correlation coefficient gets messy real quick. saw someone lose 340 bps to slippage last week chasing that "alpha" narrative lmao

Reply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-03 13:41

The multiple chains on BSC are essentially liquidity fragmentation; the key is the stability of the validation nodes. Solana has an advantage in throughput, but when it comes to the reliability of the consensus mechanism, the data is right there.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-beba108d