2026-01-03 13:24:54

The timing of following Rayls is quite interesting. At that time, the crypto community was still debating the potential of RWA, but this team had already implemented their ideas into real-world scenarios.

The most unique aspect of Rayls is not the use of many innovative technical terms, but their avoidance of self-indulgence within the crypto community from the very beginning. The core discussion is not about retail investors—it's about infrastructure layers such as banks, clearing and settlement institutions, and regulatory frameworks.

This approach is significantly different. Most projects are still cycling through debates within the crypto world, while Rayls is building solutions that traditional financial systems are willing to adopt. This is not just a technical issue but a complete shift in market positioning—from self-revolution to institutional integration.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProposalManiac

· 01-06 12:28

This is the right path. Most projects are still hyping up stories, while others are already building infrastructure. System integration vs. self-revolution, a single thought difference determines life or death.

View OriginalReply0

StableCoinKaren

· 01-05 18:19

I've been saying it all along, most projects are just self-indulgent, but Rayls is the one that truly understands the market. The real money is in traditional finance; stop just thinking about cutting retail investors all day. This is what real implementation looks like, unlike some projects that only talk about concepts. From the very beginning, focusing on the infrastructure layer, the approach is different, no wonder I am optimistic. We've been discussing RWA for so long, but few have actually dared to take action; Rayls is one of them.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 01-03 13:55

Tsk, this is the real launch window positioning, not the kind of self-indulgent technical jargon.

View OriginalReply0

MetadataExplorer

· 01-03 13:54

Really, Rayls's approach is different, directly distancing itself from that group that constantly talks about the RWA concept. While others are still telling stories, they have already connected with banks. The gap is huge. Not playing with retail investors, directly targeting large institutions—this is indeed a way out.

View OriginalReply0

alpha_leaker

· 01-03 13:54

Really, Rayls' approach has long broken out of the self-indulgent rhythm of the crypto circle. This is the right path—no more playing with retail investors, directly targeting the infrastructure layer. Wake up, everyone, RWA needs to be grounded. Many projects are still making up stories, while others have already laid the groundwork and are running. That's what real effort looks like.

View OriginalReply0

DeFiDoctor

· 01-03 13:51

To be honest, this approach of taking RWA from "proof of concept" directly to "infrastructure integration" is indeed rare, based on the case records. Most projects are still self-arguing within the retail investor circle, while others are already negotiating access at the banking level—this is not a matter of technological leadership, but a fundamental difference in strategic positioning on a different track. However, we still need to watch the subsequent liquidity indicators; connecting with the system is easy, but stable operation is another matter.

View OriginalReply0

ContractExplorer

· 01-03 13:50

Honestly, this is the correct attitude. Don't just shout slogans all day; direct dialogue with traditional finance is the real way. Rayls' approach is indeed different. It's either here to revolutionize or to do business. Most projects are self-indulgent, but this guy has long shifted his focus. Avoid retail investors and go straight to talking with banks. This kind of vision is truly broad-minded. Instead of discussing how awesome RWA is every day, it's better to implement quickly. Rayls' approach is worth learning. Don't use flashy technical jargon; being accepted within the regulatory framework is the real skill. This is what it means to find the right direction—shifting from revolution to institutional integration, the mindset has truly changed.

View OriginalReply0

RumbleValidator

· 01-03 13:36

The real difference lies in the verification layer. Most projects build self-reinforcing consensus cycles, but Rayls is working on infrastructure node integration—that's the path to scalability. From retail narratives to institutional credibility, this shift costs ten times more or more.

View OriginalReply0

RooftopReserver

· 01-03 13:27

Oh wow, this is the right way. Not bluffing with retail investors, directly confronting banks and regulators—this approach deserves a full score. Rayls is truly different this time. While others are still chanting spells in Discord, they are already negotiating partnerships with institutions. In simple terms, they have avoided the self-indulgent gameplay common in the crypto circle and have been clear from the start about who they want to do business with. I have to say, this is the real implementation of RWA (Real-World Asset) ideas; everything else is just storytelling. System integration vs. self-revolution—this difference in vision is what truly sets projects apart. This is the kind of approach I want to see.

View OriginalReply0