2026-01-03 13:25:50

At 4:27 AM, I was staring intently at GALA's trend — this horizontal line had been flat for 11 days, which was frustrating to watch. Suddenly, the monitoring system triggered a red alert: three new addresses were rapidly accumulating tokens at a rate of 1.2 million per minute. Without hesitation, I placed an order. Five hours later, GALA started to rally, the community went into a frenzy, and my account already had a 37% unrealized profit.

This actually reflects a very real issue: traditional candlestick analysis is long outdated. By the time a breakout signal appears on the chart, the smart money has already exited. My ability to position early relies on deep interpretation of on-chain behavior — those seemingly ordinary transfer records actually hide dark signals from the market makers building their positions.

The truth behind this GALA move is as follows. As early as the seventh day of sideways trading, abnormal signals appeared on-chain: the original address suddenly fragmented and transferred tokens to 87 new addresses, each receiving exactly the same amount. Who has seen this tactic? Dispersed accumulation to evade detection. Plus, at the moment Shrapnel announced migration, multiple suppliers within the ecosystem simultaneously exhibited abnormal flows — this is no coincidence.

This is the fundamental difference between on-chain data and traditional candlestick analysis. One makes you always a step behind, the other exposes the market makers’ cards in the sunlight. The key is that transforming these signals into price movements takes time, but knowing this time gap in advance is enough to change the outcome of a trade.

GALA0,33%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SwapWhisperer

· 01-06 13:25

On-chain data is indeed absolute, but the 37% figure sounds a bit questionable.

View OriginalReply0

PaperHandSister

· 01-06 09:27

The lunatics watching the market at dawn, on-chain data hunters. Don't trust K-line, trust the on-chain data. --- 37% unrealized profit? Sister, are you cheating? I'm still looking at the K-line. --- On-chain is the real truth; K-line is an illusion. Wake up, everyone. --- 87 addresses with that technique is amazing; the market makers are really teaching us how to make money. --- It's 4:30 AM again. People at this time must be making a killing. --- Wait, you mean you can see it 11 days in advance? Then I was eaten up before I even bought. --- Time difference is life and death. It's a bit late to realize this now. --- On-chain behavioral analysis should be included in the beginner's crypto course; it's much more reliable than technical analysis. --- Dispersed position building to avoid detection; market makers are really cunning. We're still looking at moving averages. --- This is the difference between smart money and retail investors: one strikes at night, the other sleeps and misses out.

View OriginalReply0

MoonBoi42

· 01-06 07:26

The on-chain sniping strategy is indeed powerful, but those watching the market at 4:27 AM must be very excited.

View OriginalReply0

down_only_larry

· 01-03 13:50

Do people who watch the market at 4 a.m. end up making money? --- This set of on-chain data sounds pretty impressive, but why can't I see it? --- 37% unrealized profit, not bad. Are you still holding it? --- 87 addresses are so neatly organized. I feel like it's more likely a big holder diversifying risk. --- Honestly, I’ve seen too many of these post-hoc analyses. --- How reliable is the monitoring system? Which platform is it from? --- I just want to know, how did you identify that these 87 new addresses belong to the same whale? --- This round of GALA is indeed interesting, but next time don’t gamble like that, you might throw up. --- On-chain data is awesome, but normal people simply don’t have the tools to see it. --- Starting up in 5 hours sounds more like luck, don’t hype it up so much.

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 01-03 13:48

People who monitor the market at 4 a.m. are indeed making money; I am still sleeping. On-chain data is definitely more powerful than candlestick charts, but the threshold is just too high. When did the 37% unrealized profit come out? Are you still in? That's right, smart money left early, and we only saw the signals. This analysis method is worth learning, or you'll always be the bagholder.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 01-03 13:44

On-chain data is the real launch window; candlestick charts are always rearview mirrors.

View OriginalReply0

ContractBugHunter

· 01-03 13:41

The person on duty at 4 a.m. is the one making money, I believe it. 87 addresses synchronized reception, this tactic is indeed brilliant. Candlestick charts are no longer useful; on-chain data is the real celebration. 37% unrealized profit isn't much; the key is to find the pattern. Why does it feel like you're telling a story, a bit fabricated? I've heard this method of market maker accumulation too many times. Is this really the case this time, or are they just going to cut the leeks again? Can on-chain data be deceptive, or is it a problem with analysis skills? Next time you use this trick, I’ll believe you’re a ghost. It looks very professional, but why not share signals earlier?

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 01-03 13:39

Trading at 4 a.m. is routine, but the key is to have the right tools; otherwise, it's just pure gambling. On-chain data can indeed reveal some insights, but those who make money are always the earliest movers. Latecomers like us are destined to be a step behind. A 37% unrealized profit is pretty good. When do you plan to cash out? Or continue holding? The threshold for on-chain analysis isn't that high; most people can't understand the significance of fragmented addresses. Traditional candlestick charts are indeed outdated, but on-chain analysis also needs to be combined with fundamentals to be reliable. Looking at data alone makes it easy to get caught. GALA's rise is entirely thanks to the Shrapnel news; on-chain data is just the icing on the cake. Don't overhype it. 11 days of sideways movement—can you all endure it? When I get FOMO, I just go for it. This is the information gap. Having tools or not really makes two different worlds. By the way, what is your monitoring system? Can you share it, or is it paid? If I had known about this strategy earlier, I would have tried it long ago. But at this point, entering GALA feels a bit late.

View OriginalReply0

MissingSats

· 01-03 13:36

At 4:27 AM, I was also stunned by the sniping, but the on-chain data is indeed unmatched.

View OriginalReply0