The fairest approach to reward distribution is having participants share their threads and detailed analysis through retweets. This creates a transparent, community-driven selection process. We'll review all submissions and pick the standout contributions over the next few days. It's a straightforward way to let quality speak for itself while keeping everyone engaged in the process.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ruggedNotShrugged
· 01-06 02:39
Relying on sharing for rewards? Sounds good, but I'm just worried that in the end, it's still the big accounts that get the benefits.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryBaby
· 01-05 09:20
It's quite transparent; it all depends on whether someone truly follows the established procedures.
View OriginalReply0
MetaMaximalist
· 01-03 18:40
ngl this retweet-based curation thing feels kinda surface-level... like, you're basically just gamifying engagement metrics instead of actually filtering for substantive chain-agnostic research. the whole "quality speaks for itself" framing is where most projects lose me tbh
Reply0
SchrödingersNode
· 01-03 13:58
Repost voting system? Sounds very democratic, but I'm worried it will just turn into a popularity contest again.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterXiao
· 01-03 13:57
A transparent mechanism is good, but I'm worried that in the end, insiders will still benefit.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 01-03 13:55
This process is indeed clean and straightforward, but ultimately, who can create groundbreaking content is what really matters.
View OriginalReply0
PortfolioAlert
· 01-03 13:51
Relying on retweets for rewards? I've seen this trick too many times in the crypto world, and in the end, it's just insiders dominating everything.
View OriginalReply0
ContractCollector
· 01-03 13:43
The retweet mechanism is good, but how do we ensure that it doesn't end up being dominated by those few big influencers again?
View OriginalReply0
ForumMiningMaster
· 01-03 13:34
Repost selection? This tactic sounds quite fair, but we all know that the most reposted ones aren't necessarily the highest quality.
The fairest approach to reward distribution is having participants share their threads and detailed analysis through retweets. This creates a transparent, community-driven selection process. We'll review all submissions and pick the standout contributions over the next few days. It's a straightforward way to let quality speak for itself while keeping everyone engaged in the process.