Recently, key figures in the Solana ecosystem have been discussing the development direction of Jupiter, and the core idea is very interesting: "Staking beats buybacks." The logic behind this statement is worth exploring in detail.
Buybacks can directly boost the token price with immediate effects, but the money comes in quickly and leaves just as fast, making it hard to retain genuine long-term capital. Staking, on the other hand, is different—it’s about building a "long-term capital structure." Those willing to lock their tokens for a year can dilute short-term holders through mechanisms, essentially allowing those who believe in the project to gain more rights. The capital accumulation logic starting from 10 years in traditional finance also applies in the crypto world, just with shorter cycles, but the approach remains consistent: slow but steady.
As Solana’s leading DEX, Jupiter’s choice is significant, as it determines whether the project takes the route of "short-term hype" or "long-term barrier building." Opting for staking means the project’s profits are converted into long-term assets, with users locking their tokens to earn yields. As the protocol scales, the rights of long-term holders naturally increase. This effectively provides the project with a "resilience to volatility."
There are two signals for us to pay attention to. First, if Jupiter truly follows this path, the short-term token price may not be as explosive, but its long-term stability will be stronger, suitable for holders who can hold on. Second, this "long-term capital structure" will become a trend in the sector. When evaluating projects in the future, don’t just look at buyback data; instead, check whether they have mechanisms to attract long-term holders.
However, risks must also be considered: staking and locking tokens carry liquidity risks. If your funds are short-term, don’t force yourself into long-term staking. The truly suitable approach is to use idle funds to participate, and only those who are willing to stay with the project for over a year should play.
How can ordinary users follow suit? First, if you hold relevant tokens, pay attention to community votes, and when a staking mechanism is introduced, try a portion of your holdings. Second, when screening Solana ecosystem projects later, prioritize those with long-term capital mechanisms. Third, don’t be swayed by short-term price fluctuations; long-term staking yields are tied to the project’s growth.
Honestly, the "quick profit" logic in the crypto space is becoming less effective. Projects that can accumulate long-term capital are the ones that can survive bull and bear cycles. This advice is actually paving a more stable development path for leading ecosystem projects.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketLightning
· 01-05 20:53
Staking indeed retains people better than buybacks, but honestly, it still depends on whether the project itself is worth waiting a year for.
Wait, isn't this logic similar to Curve's ve mechanism? Feels like the Solana ecosystem is copying homework.
If there's no short-term increase, retail investors will run again. At that time, who can bear the liquidity risk of staking?
No matter how nicely it's said, it's still locking up funds. I still want my money to be a bit more free.
I've heard this "long-term barrier-building" rhetoric too many times, and in the end, it still ends up crashing.
View OriginalReply0
GetRichLeek
· 01-04 08:51
Bro, this set of theories sounds impressive, but I have to come clean—I’m the kind of person who FOMO’s when I see staking yields. Last time, I bought the dip halfway up the mountain and lost 30% in blood. Now you want to lock up for a year again? Maybe I should first check the on-chain distribution of chips before making a move.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 01-03 14:55
Staking > Buyback. I think the logic makes sense, but how many people can really stick to a one-year lock-up? Most still want to sell quickly.
If JUP really takes this route, it will be boring in the short term, but on the other hand, there aren't many projects that can survive a bear market.
The SOL ecosystem currently lacks projects with such resolve. Compared to those that buy back and pump daily, I am optimistic about long-term stability.
However, liquidity risk must be taken seriously. Don't lock all your life-saving money, or you'll really become a leek.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropATM
· 01-03 14:54
Staking vs. Buyback. This theory makes a lot of sense, finally some leading projects have figured it out.
Locking for a year to filter long-term players is indeed a clever strategy; short-term pump-and-dump traders will naturally be eliminated.
Speaking of Jupiter, if this move pays off, can other Solana projects follow suit?
I'm really worried about becoming one of the few top projects that get the benefits, while retail investors are only left with the crumbs.
But I do have some idle funds, so I might try staking.
Staking has risks—liquidity could be locked up. What if something goes wrong?
The era of making quick money is really over; that hits hard.
If this wave succeeds, the way we evaluate projects will need to change.
It's not just about the token price; we need to look at ecosystem depth and long-term mechanisms.
Honestly, I still prefer short-term gains. Who can wait a year?
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 01-03 14:45
Staking vs. Buyback, this wave is definitely an upgrade in thinking. The era of making quick money is over, really.
---
The returns you can only get after locking up for a year basically depend on whether the project survives. I still want to see how Jupiter really handles this.
---
Come on, if there's no short-term gains, why should I participate... I need to think about whether I'm a long-term or short-term investor.
---
This logic is actually just the traditional finance approach, a crypto version of dividends. Looks good but beware of liquidity traps.
---
So now, choosing projects based on staking mechanisms is more important than buybacks? I need to change my screening method.
---
If Jupiter really does this, will the Solana ecosystem follow suit? Feels like it will become standard.
---
Idle funds can be tried, but don’t put your life-saving money into it. That’s a very honest way to put it.
Recently, key figures in the Solana ecosystem have been discussing the development direction of Jupiter, and the core idea is very interesting: "Staking beats buybacks." The logic behind this statement is worth exploring in detail.
Buybacks can directly boost the token price with immediate effects, but the money comes in quickly and leaves just as fast, making it hard to retain genuine long-term capital. Staking, on the other hand, is different—it’s about building a "long-term capital structure." Those willing to lock their tokens for a year can dilute short-term holders through mechanisms, essentially allowing those who believe in the project to gain more rights. The capital accumulation logic starting from 10 years in traditional finance also applies in the crypto world, just with shorter cycles, but the approach remains consistent: slow but steady.
As Solana’s leading DEX, Jupiter’s choice is significant, as it determines whether the project takes the route of "short-term hype" or "long-term barrier building." Opting for staking means the project’s profits are converted into long-term assets, with users locking their tokens to earn yields. As the protocol scales, the rights of long-term holders naturally increase. This effectively provides the project with a "resilience to volatility."
There are two signals for us to pay attention to. First, if Jupiter truly follows this path, the short-term token price may not be as explosive, but its long-term stability will be stronger, suitable for holders who can hold on. Second, this "long-term capital structure" will become a trend in the sector. When evaluating projects in the future, don’t just look at buyback data; instead, check whether they have mechanisms to attract long-term holders.
However, risks must also be considered: staking and locking tokens carry liquidity risks. If your funds are short-term, don’t force yourself into long-term staking. The truly suitable approach is to use idle funds to participate, and only those who are willing to stay with the project for over a year should play.
How can ordinary users follow suit? First, if you hold relevant tokens, pay attention to community votes, and when a staking mechanism is introduced, try a portion of your holdings. Second, when screening Solana ecosystem projects later, prioritize those with long-term capital mechanisms. Third, don’t be swayed by short-term price fluctuations; long-term staking yields are tied to the project’s growth.
Honestly, the "quick profit" logic in the crypto space is becoming less effective. Projects that can accumulate long-term capital are the ones that can survive bull and bear cycles. This advice is actually paving a more stable development path for leading ecosystem projects.