2026-01-03 15:27:19

Recently, I discovered an interesting account in the contract strategy ranking of a major exchange — FaJie Idealism.

My first impression was that this is not an account built on luck and intuition. There is clearly a comprehensive risk management system supporting it. It feels like looking at a trading account with genuine money management rules, not the type that relies on luck.

Unfortunately, I can't follow it directly, which would have been great.

Looking closely at the data, it's actually quite clean: cumulative return, drawdown control, win rate distribution — each metric is presented very systematically, without the erratic fluctuations of highs and lows. Accounts like this are often worth paying attention to because their stability itself indicates the reliability of their trading logic. If I could track similar trading ideas, I could learn a lot.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

rugpull_survivor

· 01-06 15:27

The FaJie WeiXin account does have some substance; its data stability is quite good. However, the lack of copy trading functionality is indeed a drawback. Traders with strong stability are often the most worth observing—that's true risk control awareness. A high win rate with low drawdown either means incredible luck or genuine strategies. This account seems to be the latter. If the data is so clean, not allowing copy trading actually makes it a bit mysterious. Risk management systems can't be judged solely by data; you need to see how they handle turbulent markets.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e51e87c7

· 01-05 23:26

The FaJie WeiXin account really has some substance; its stability is much more regulated than most people. If it weren't for the so-so copy trading feature, I would have followed it long ago. The data is so clean that it actually makes me curious about how they are operating behind the scenes.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 01-03 15:57

Laughing to death, I’ve just discovered another "stability expert." I’m still chasing gains and selling losses here. The FaJie WeiXin account is really ruthless. My small account based on "intuition" can’t compare at all. If only I could directly copy his brain, so I wouldn’t have to fight with the K-line every day. This is what real trading logic looks like. My approach is more like a "gambler’s mentality combined with impatience." The returns built on stability are indeed much more reliable than the thrill of relying on luck.

View OriginalReply0

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

· 01-03 15:57

Data is so stable, it's really rare, but on the other hand, not being able to follow orders is quite frustrating. These accounts look comfortable, but I'm just worried that a turning point in the data might come unexpectedly. Those with good risk control are all silent; truly profitable ones never show off. It feels like there's a system automatically executing, not just some random player making moves based on gut feeling. Why can't they just add a follow feature? They have to make it so complicated. Stable accounts like these are often more dangerous because once they crash, everyone suffers.

View OriginalReply0

LayerZeroJunkie

· 01-03 15:56

The FaJie WeiXin account is indeed stable; the data is there, and it can't be fooled. A real trading system with genuine effort, unlike some accounts that rely on luck to succeed. It would be perfect if copy trading were possible; for now, I can only secretly learn the strategies. Stability is the true test of a trader's real skill. This kind of account is worth long-term observation; every detail is carefully considered.

View OriginalReply0

HashBrownies

· 01-03 15:37

Yes, this account is indeed stable, not the kind of data that boasts The name "Legal Realm Idealism" is perfect, just like his trading style, meticulous It's a pity that copying trades isn't even an option But on the other hand, what’s truly valuable is never copying trades, but understanding the underlying logic I feel like these kinds of accounts are more about teaching people how to survive, not how to get rich quickly Wait, is this guy's win rate really that stable? Is there no exaggeration involved? He looks like someone who takes trading seriously, unlike those day traders The key is that accounts capable of controlling drawdowns are too few, truly rare It would be great if this account had a tutorial

View OriginalReply0

ProxyCollector

· 01-03 15:34

Stability is indeed a threshold, much more reliable than accounts that experience wild fluctuations. The data for this account, "Legal Realm Idealism," looks really comfortable, without that gambler's temperament. Not many people manage risk so meticulously; it's worth paying attention to. This kind of stable growth logic is truly worth learning from, more effective than listening to big influencers boast. Controlling drawdowns so well is really not easy.

View OriginalReply0