2026-01-05 14:20:09

#数字资产动态追踪 Have you ever thought that the biggest risk facing $BTC actually comes from AI?

As AI agent technology evolves, the existing blockchain architecture seems to be falling behind. These autonomous agents require more efficient on-chain interactions, more flexible permission models, and faster confirmation speeds. If we continue to use outdated design logic, AI will be unable to fully deploy on the encrypted network.

What does this mean? Blockchain may need a fundamental redesign—from consensus mechanisms to smart contract layers—to rethink how to optimize for new participants like AI agents. Otherwise, the integration of AI and crypto will remain fragmented.

BTC4,96%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

21 Likes

Reward
21
10
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SerLiquidated

· 01-07 21:05

It sounds like another fundamental overhaul is coming. Every time, they talk about a revolutionary reset, but it ends up being the same old thing...

View OriginalReply0

DeFiAlchemist

· 01-06 12:41

ngl this whole "AI can't optimize on legacy chains" thesis is just another layer of the transmutation problem... the real bottleneck isn't architecture, it's algorithmic equilibrium. we're trying to feed autonomous agents through consensus mechanisms designed for humans. that's like... running a philosopher's stone through a medieval furnace.

Reply0

DefiOldTrickster

· 01-06 05:49

Ha, another argument that "blockchain is doomed." I've heard this line back in 2017.

View OriginalReply0

StablecoinGuardian

· 01-05 23:56

Alright, here we go again with the "blockchain is doomed" argument, but this time the reason is AI? That's interesting. Wait, do AI agents really need to be that fast and flexible, or are we over-engineering again... BTC has many risks, do we really have to blame AI for it? This logic is a bit far-fetched, better to say it's just some new project marketing tactics. Blockchain has been changed so many times; what kind of version would satisfy all parties?

View OriginalReply0

DeFiCaffeinator

· 01-05 14:50

Speaking of which, the chain really needs to keep up with the speed of AI now, or it will be awkward. Does BTC really have to face this problem, or is it just another wave of hype around concepts? If the architecture isn't changed, AI agents will indeed get stuck, and that's no small matter. Wait, redesign the consensus mechanism? That seems extremely difficult... The combination of AI and blockchain indeed requires new ideas; currently, there's a bit of a disconnect. If not changed, AI won't be able to fully unleash its potential; this logic makes sense. So, a new underlying design is necessary; the current architecture is indeed outdated. The permission model is really a bottleneck; AI agents need more freedom and environmental friendliness. This time, a truly breakthrough solution might be needed, or there will be no hope. In my opinion, a new public chain might be necessary to solve this problem, rather than just modifying Bitcoin.

View OriginalReply0

HodlOrRegret

· 01-05 14:49

Basically, BTC is going to be wiped out by AI. The current chain indeed can't keep up. With AI agents running rampant, we need to upgrade quickly or we're really doomed. This guy's point is valid—if the consensus mechanism isn't changed, we're just digging our own grave. Wait... who can guarantee that the new design won't be countered by AI? The chain is so slow, how can AI play? That's definitely a problem. Redesigning sounds simple, but how long would it actually take to implement?

View OriginalReply0

BTCWaveRider

· 01-05 14:49

Wake up everyone, isn't this logic reversed? BTC is not afraid of AI at all. Wait, does blockchain have to change for AI? I think the reverse could also work. This guy is overthinking it. If that day really comes, there would already be a plan. Sounds nice, but isn't it just some projects looking for an excuse to raise funds... AI agents running on the chain? I always feel it's a false demand. But speaking of which, technology really needs to update quickly. Oh, don't talk nonsense, it will cause a dump. I'm still in a deep position. The real risk is regulation. Don't swing the hammer here and there. It just feels like putting old wine in new bottles, rephrasing to cut another wave. Nonsense, BTC has seen everything in these 10+ years, still steady as ever.

View OriginalReply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 01-05 14:28

Doesn't this mean that blockchain technology itself might become obsolete? Is that true or false? --- After AI agents became popular, the issue of blockchain performance lagging has been raised for a while. It all depends on who can develop a solution first. --- Wait, isn't the logic reversed here? Shouldn't AI adapt to blockchain rather than the other way around? --- I just want to know if those Layer 2 solutions are now working overtime to optimize this aspect. --- Another story about "blockchain is doomed." I've heard it too many times. --- So, to be straightforward, chains that aren't optimized for AI basically have no future.

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSurvivor

· 01-05 14:27

This logic is reversed. AI won't be restricted by the chain; instead, the chain needs to adapt to AI's needs. Eventually, there might be a dedicated AI public chain.

View OriginalReply0

ProtocolRebel

· 01-05 14:25

Basically, the existing blockchain can't withstand this wave of AI at all; a reconstruction is inevitable sooner or later.

View OriginalReply0