Source: CryptoTale
Original Title: South Korea Pushes Early Account Freezes to Stop Crypto Abuse
Original Link:
Overview
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is advancing measures to freeze suspect crypto accounts earlier in investigations, aiming to prevent illegal profits from being transferred and hidden. The proposal emerged from FSC discussions in November 2025 regarding virtual asset price manipulation enforcement.
Current Enforcement Challenges
The FSC identified critical gaps in existing Virtual Asset User Protection Act provisions. Current regulations only restrict deposits and withdrawals at exchanges, but suspects can still transfer funds to personal wallets or traditional financial institutions, making asset tracking extremely difficult.
During investigations, suspects often move funds rapidly through multiple channels before authorities can secure court-ordered seizures. This window of opportunity allows illegal gains to become concealed, hindering both investigation and asset recovery efforts.
Proposed Solution: Early Payment Freezes
Commissioners proposed implementing preemptive payment suspension authority that would:
Restrict all outbound fund movements from suspect accounts
Block transfers to personal wallets and linked bank accounts
Preserve both realized and unrealized profits during investigations
Support subsequent confiscation and fine proceedings
This approach aims to lock assets in place early rather than attempting recovery after concealment occurs.
Capital Markets Act Precedent
The FSC referenced successful implementation of similar measures under the Capital Markets Act. In September 2025, authorities froze 75 accounts in a coordinated stock manipulation case involving roughly 100 billion won in suspected illegal gains. The freeze preserved both realized profits (40 billion won) and unrealized gains (unsold shares), enabling regulators to pursue confiscation of the original 100 billion won used in the scheme and prepare fines up to 80 billion won.
Commissioners described this case as demonstrating how early asset preservation strengthens enforcement outcomes and suggested similar authority could enhance crypto market oversight.
Legislative Direction
Official discussions indicate phase two virtual asset legislation will likely incorporate payment suspension provisions modeled on capital market rules. Key considerations include:
Addressing crypto’s faster asset mobility compared to traditional markets
Coordinating with prosecutors and courts on implementation
Balancing preventive controls with due process protections
Determining scope of applicable Capital Markets Act provisions for crypto enforcement
Lawmakers expect these enforcement principles to shape the next legislative draft. The FSC continues reviewing implementation details, with further developments dependent on legislative progress.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MEVHunterX
· 01-06 16:06
Korea is freezing assets here again... Do they really think freezing accounts can cure market manipulation?
View OriginalReply0
SybilAttackVictim
· 01-06 10:40
Korea's speed is really fast. Frozen accounts before even investigating? It feels a bit rough.
View OriginalReply0
SocialAnxietyStaker
· 01-06 10:35
South Korea's move is aggressive—freezing accounts to prevent fleeing, but it seems more like treating the symptoms rather than the root cause...
View OriginalReply0
GasGrillMaster
· 01-06 10:29
Korea's move is aggressive; the account freeze process has become much faster... But honestly, can they really catch the dirty money?
View OriginalReply0
NFTPessimist
· 01-06 10:28
Freeze accounts early? This move by Korea is probably aimed at trapping those involved in illicit activities... But on the other hand, could innocent people also be affected?
South Korea Pursues Early Payment Freezes to Combat Crypto Market Manipulation
Source: CryptoTale Original Title: South Korea Pushes Early Account Freezes to Stop Crypto Abuse Original Link:
Overview
South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is advancing measures to freeze suspect crypto accounts earlier in investigations, aiming to prevent illegal profits from being transferred and hidden. The proposal emerged from FSC discussions in November 2025 regarding virtual asset price manipulation enforcement.
Current Enforcement Challenges
The FSC identified critical gaps in existing Virtual Asset User Protection Act provisions. Current regulations only restrict deposits and withdrawals at exchanges, but suspects can still transfer funds to personal wallets or traditional financial institutions, making asset tracking extremely difficult.
During investigations, suspects often move funds rapidly through multiple channels before authorities can secure court-ordered seizures. This window of opportunity allows illegal gains to become concealed, hindering both investigation and asset recovery efforts.
Proposed Solution: Early Payment Freezes
Commissioners proposed implementing preemptive payment suspension authority that would:
This approach aims to lock assets in place early rather than attempting recovery after concealment occurs.
Capital Markets Act Precedent
The FSC referenced successful implementation of similar measures under the Capital Markets Act. In September 2025, authorities froze 75 accounts in a coordinated stock manipulation case involving roughly 100 billion won in suspected illegal gains. The freeze preserved both realized profits (40 billion won) and unrealized gains (unsold shares), enabling regulators to pursue confiscation of the original 100 billion won used in the scheme and prepare fines up to 80 billion won.
Commissioners described this case as demonstrating how early asset preservation strengthens enforcement outcomes and suggested similar authority could enhance crypto market oversight.
Legislative Direction
Official discussions indicate phase two virtual asset legislation will likely incorporate payment suspension provisions modeled on capital market rules. Key considerations include:
Lawmakers expect these enforcement principles to shape the next legislative draft. The FSC continues reviewing implementation details, with further developments dependent on legislative progress.