The "撸毛" studios and traffic boosting teams have long been stubborn problems in the crypto ecosystem. This time, I want to have a proper discussion.
On the surface, these operations seem like "stepping stones" for participants, but in reality, they are stumbling blocks to industry development—faking prosperity masks real demand, and bad money drives out good. Those data built on traffic boosting, those fake hype maintained through "撸毛," will ultimately become tombstones of trust between projects and users.
This topic is indeed sensitive, but if we don't speak up, no one will know where the root cause lies. For healthy industry development, someone must dare to point out these deadly mudslides. Sharing more thoughts tonight—interested friends, don't miss out.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasBandit
· 01-08 21:09
Really, the Lumo team is a tumor and should have been cleaned up long ago.
The inflated data is all fake, it's really annoying to look at.
That's why I don't trust most new projects; most of them are just air.
Not many dare to say this, gotta give them credit.
The saying "bad money drives out good" hits the nail on the head, so true.
View OriginalReply0
P2ENotWorking
· 01-06 10:51
Really, the "Luo Mao" team is just a tumor in the industry. It was long overdue for proper regulation.
Exactly right, false data harms people deeply, someone needs to break through this facade.
What’s the point of boosting views and heat? In the end, it’s just shooting oneself in the foot.
That’s why good projects go unnoticed, while low-quality projects are everywhere.
Someone needs to dare to tell the truth, or the entire ecosystem will be dragged down by these people.
View OriginalReply0
MevHunter
· 01-06 10:48
The industry's cancer needs to be cured, but few dare to speak out openly.
The practice of exploiting users should have been eliminated long ago, and it's still harming newcomers.
That's right, false prosperity ultimately ends up costing retail investors their money.
Why are these studios still so rampant? Aren't exchanges doing anything about it?
The saying "bad money drives out good" hits home; some projects are destroyed just like that.
Once trust is gone, everything is over. Trust is now valuable in the ecosystem.
Someone needs to dare to tell the truth, or everyone will just deceive themselves.
Really, I've seen too many projects die because of false data.
This problem is much more serious than most people think.
View OriginalReply0
WagmiWarrior
· 01-06 10:46
Someone should have exposed this facade long ago. Tired of those false data.
Boosting numbers and grabbing rewards, basically the cancer of the industry, still deluding ourselves.
Only a thorough cleanup can truly reshuffle the deck; otherwise, it's all vanity.
Once trust collapses, no matter how many projects there are, they can't be saved.
There must be voices, or the ecosystem will be completely rotten.
View OriginalReply0
WalletDetective
· 01-06 10:32
Really, I just want to laugh when I see those inflated data; even the project team believes it themselves.
The ecosystem of scalp trading should have been cleaned up a long time ago, or else bad coins will really drive out good coins.
At the end of the day, it's still about lost trust; if the data is fake, users will disperse.
Not many dare to poke this nest, but someone really should speak up.
The "撸毛" studios and traffic boosting teams have long been stubborn problems in the crypto ecosystem. This time, I want to have a proper discussion.
On the surface, these operations seem like "stepping stones" for participants, but in reality, they are stumbling blocks to industry development—faking prosperity masks real demand, and bad money drives out good. Those data built on traffic boosting, those fake hype maintained through "撸毛," will ultimately become tombstones of trust between projects and users.
This topic is indeed sensitive, but if we don't speak up, no one will know where the root cause lies. For healthy industry development, someone must dare to point out these deadly mudslides. Sharing more thoughts tonight—interested friends, don't miss out.