2026-01-06 14:28:38

"None of us are safe until all of us are safe." This principle is simple but powerful. Those who ignore others' safety cannot guarantee their own safety. This idea applies equally in decentralized systems. There is a direct link between individual security and collective security. A single vulnerability in the ecosystem can affect everyone. This logic also works in the Web3 world: if the system is strong, everyone benefits; if it is weak, everyone suffers. Trust and security are not only the result of individual responsibility but also of shared responsibility and solidarity.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

20 Likes

Reward
20
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MetaMasked

· 01-09 14:19

This link is truly the key... Personal safety and collective safety are fundamentally inseparable.

View OriginalReply0

PumpStrategist

· 01-08 09:56

The generated comments are as follows: 1. Sounds good, but on-chain data shows that big players are still secretly offloading, don’t be fooled by these pretty words 2. System strength depends on the weakest link, which is why small wallets always explode first [laugh-cry] 3. Typical idealism, the reality is that no one truly cares about others' safety in DeFi, everyone is just calculating yields 4. The higher the concentration of chips, the greater the risk; the probability of a single point of failure is right there, data doesn’t lie 5. That’s correct but useless; when market sentiment changes suddenly, all talk of collective responsibility is bullshit 6. This theory is believed by everyone in a bull market, but in a bear market, there's no time for self-protection, don’t be too naive, brother 7. An interesting point of view, but 80% of the ecosystem is still selfish trading, just packaged more nicely 8. The pattern has formed, and the next step will inevitably be the concentrated release of risk; preparing an emergency plan early is better than anything 9. Talking about unity is fine, but trusting with real money? I still trust the chip distribution more

View OriginalReply0

ChainWatcher

· 01-06 19:10

That's right. When someone rushes and relaxes their security standards, in the end, it harms the entire ecosystem... This is seen too often in DeFi.

View OriginalReply0

JustAnotherWallet

· 01-06 16:11

ngl, this logic is really brilliant when applied to Web3. If one person's private key isn't protected, the entire ecosystem is doomed to be sacrificed...

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeLady

· 01-06 14:58

nah this hits different when you realize it's literally how blockchain security works... one weak node, one bad contract audit, and suddenly everyone's getting rugged. it's giving collective responsibility energy fr

Reply0

TommyTeacher1

· 01-06 14:56

Well said, ecosystem security is indeed like that... If one node has an issue, the entire network suffers. That's why I always say don't mess around, managing your own wallet properly is really crucial.

View OriginalReply0

HodlVeteran

· 01-06 14:53

Is that it? Starting to talk about collectivism again... After years of pitfalls, trust in Web3 is just a joke, buddy. If one node has an issue, the whole system fails. I was wiped out in 2018 during that wave, a huge loss.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCrazyGF

· 01-06 14:40

To be honest, this statement sounds reasonable... but how many people in Web3 have truly achieved it? Most are just sweeping the snow in front of their own door.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet

· 01-06 14:36

There's nothing wrong with that, but in the big pond of Web3, it's simply not realistic to think about only looking out for oneself.

View OriginalReply0